If HER2 immunohistochemistry is 3+ and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) testing is pending, what is the likelihood that the FISH result will be negative?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 21, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

HER2 IHC 3+ with Pending FISH: Likelihood of Negative Result

When HER2 immunohistochemistry is 3+, the likelihood of a negative FISH result is very low, approximately 5-15%, with the vast majority (>90%) of IHC 3+ cases showing HER2 gene amplification by FISH 1, 2.

Evidence from Large-Scale Data

The most robust data comes from the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline analysis, which examined multiple large laboratory datasets 2:

  • Mayo Clinic data (3,089 cases): Among IHC 3+ cases, 91.7% showed FISH amplification 3
  • Multiple reference laboratories consistently demonstrated that IHC 3+ cases have amplification rates ranging from 83.3% to 91.7% 2, 3
  • The discordance rate (IHC 3+ but FISH negative) ranges from 7-17% across different studies 4, 5

Clinical Implications

Why This Matters

The 2023 ASCO/CAP guidelines explicitly address this scenario 1:

  • If IHC is 3+, the diagnosis is HER2 POSITIVE regardless of certain FISH patterns
  • This reflects the recognition that strong, uniform protein overexpression (IHC 3+) is clinically meaningful even in rare cases where gene amplification is not detected

Common Causes of Discordance

When IHC 3+ cases are FISH-negative (the minority), potential explanations include:

  • Chromosome 17 polysomy - increased CEP17 signals can mask true amplification ratios 6
  • Technical issues - fixation artifacts, tissue processing problems, or counting errors
  • Biological heterogeneity - sampling different tumor areas between tests
  • True polysomy without amplification - rare cases with increased HER2 copies but no true gene amplification 6

Practical Guidance

What to Expect

  • Most likely outcome (>85%): FISH will be positive, confirming HER2-positive status
  • Less likely outcome (5-15%): FISH will be negative or equivocal

If FISH Returns Negative

According to current guidelines 1:

  • Review both IHC and FISH slides together to ensure concordant areas were assessed
  • Consider technical issues with either test
  • In cases with average HER2 signals ≥6.0 but ratio <2.0 (Group 3), if IHC is 3+, the diagnosis remains HER2 POSITIVE 1
  • Consider chromosome 17 polysomy as a confounding factor

Key Caveat

The 2023 guidelines prioritize IHC 3+ results in specific scenarios, meaning that even with certain FISH patterns previously considered negative, the case may still be classified as HER2-positive if IHC shows strong, uniform 3+ staining 1. This represents a shift toward recognizing that protein overexpression itself has clinical significance for treatment decisions.

Bottom Line

With IHC 3+, you should anticipate FISH confirmation in approximately 85-92% of cases. The small percentage of discordant results requires careful technical review and may still result in a HER2-positive diagnosis depending on the specific FISH pattern and guideline algorithms 1, 2.

budget:token_budget Tokens used this turn: 3508 Tokens used total: 3508 Budget remaining: 196492

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.