What is the recommended approach to a CT of the frontal sinus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The recommended approach to a CT of the frontal sinus involves obtaining both coronal and axial views with thin-slice (1-3 mm) technique without contrast, unless complications are suspected. This approach is supported by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria 1, which emphasize the importance of CT imaging in evaluating sinonasal disease, including rhinosinusitis and mass lesions.

Key Considerations

  • Multiplanar reconstructions should be performed to fully evaluate the complex anatomy of the frontal sinus and its drainage pathway 1.
  • The scan should include the entire paranasal sinus region from the frontal sinus to the maxillary alveolar ridge, with particular attention to the frontal recess and frontal sinus outflow tract 1.
  • For suspected complications such as intracranial extension or orbital involvement, contrast-enhanced imaging should be added 1.
  • Patient positioning should be standardized with the head in neutral position to allow for accurate assessment of air-fluid levels if present.

Supporting Evidence

  • The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria recommend CT imaging for evaluating sinonasal disease, including rhinosinusitis and mass lesions 1.
  • CT imaging provides excellent delineation of the complex ethmoidal anatomy, ostiomeatal unit, and anatomic variations, making it essential for preoperative planning and surgical guidance 1.
  • Low-dose CT protocols can reduce patient radiation exposure while maintaining image quality 1.

Clinical Application

  • This approach provides optimal visualization of the frontal sinus anatomy, mucosal thickening, bony abnormalities, and potential obstructions of the frontal recess, which are essential for diagnosing conditions like frontal sinusitis, mucoceles, or fractures, and for surgical planning when intervention is required 1.

From the Research

Approach to CT of Frontal Sinus

The approach to CT of the frontal sinus involves considering the effective dose and image quality.

  • A low-dose CT protocol can be used to reduce radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy 2.
  • The use of cone beam CT (CBCT) is also a promising modality for imaging the paranasal sinuses, including the frontal sinus, with lower radiation dose and less metal artifact compared to conventional CT scans 3.
  • However, the sensitivity of low-dose CT for detecting acute sinusitis in the frontal sinus is lower (83%) compared to other sinuses 2.
  • A study using a single volumetric 320-row multidetector CT technique with a low-dose protocol (135 kV, 5 mAs) showed that noncontrast paranasal sinus CT imaging can be performed at very low radiation exposure while maintaining high image quality 4.

Key Considerations

  • Effective dose: The effective dose of low-dose CT protocols can be significantly lower than standard-dose CT protocols 2, 4.
  • Image quality: The image quality of low-dose CT protocols can be maintained while reducing radiation exposure 2, 4.
  • Modality: CBCT can be used as an alternative to conventional CT scans for imaging the paranasal sinuses, including the frontal sinus, with lower radiation dose and less metal artifact 3.

Diagnostic Accuracy

  • The diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT protocols for detecting acute sinusitis in the frontal sinus is lower (83% sensitivity) compared to other sinuses 2.
  • The use of CBCT can provide clear delineation of the principal surgically relevant osseous structures, but soft tissue visibility is limited 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.