Does a reversal of the transmitral E/A flow indicate diastolic dysfunction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 31, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

E/A Reversal and Diastolic Dysfunction

E/A reversal (E/A <1) indicates impaired left ventricular relaxation, which represents Grade I diastolic dysfunction, but it does NOT automatically mean clinically significant diastolic dysfunction or elevated filling pressures 1.

Understanding E/A Reversal in Context

The E/A ratio alone is insufficient to diagnose diastolic dysfunction because:

  • Normal aging causes E/A reversal - Healthy elderly individuals commonly show E/A <1 due to age-related slowing of LV relaxation, mimicking mild diastolic dysfunction seen in younger patients 1
  • E/A reversal represents only ONE stage in the spectrum of diastolic dysfunction
  • Loading conditions heavily influence the E/A ratio, making it unreliable as a standalone measure

The Diastolic Dysfunction Spectrum

When diastolic dysfunction progresses, the E/A ratio follows a characteristic pattern 1:

  1. Grade I (Impaired Relaxation): E/A <1 with normal filling pressures

    • Prolonged deceleration time
    • Prolonged IVRT
    • This is what E/A reversal typically indicates
  2. Grade II (Pseudonormal): E/A appears normal (0.8-1.5) BUT filling pressures are elevated

    • Critical pitfall: Looks normal but represents worsening disease
    • Can be unmasked with Valsalva maneuver (E/A decreases ≥50%) 1
  3. Grade III (Restrictive): E/A >2 with markedly elevated filling pressures

    • Shortened deceleration time (<150 msec)
    • Associated with poor prognosis 2

What You Actually Need to Diagnose Diastolic Dysfunction

The 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines require a multiparametric approach 1:

Essential Additional Parameters:

  • E/e' ratio: Average E/e' >14 indicates elevated filling pressures (more reliable than E/A alone)
  • LA volume index: >34 mL/m² suggests chronically elevated pressures
  • Peak TR velocity: >2.8 m/sec indicates elevated pulmonary pressures
  • Pulmonary vein flow: Ar-A duration ≥30 msec suggests elevated LVEDP

The Algorithm:

  1. Measure E/A ratio AND septal/lateral e' velocities
  2. Calculate average E/e' ratio
  3. Assess LA volume index
  4. Measure TR velocity if present
  5. If ≥3 of 4 criteria are positive (E/e' >14, LA volume >34 mL/m², TR velocity >2.8 m/sec, E/A <0.8 with e' <7 cm/sec), diastolic dysfunction with elevated filling pressures is present 3

Critical Clinical Pitfalls

Do not diagnose diastolic dysfunction based solely on E/A reversal because:

  • Young athletes may have E/A <1 due to enhanced atrial function (normal variant)
  • Tachycardia causes E and A wave fusion, making E/A unreliable 1
  • Mitral regurgitation artificially elevates E velocity, masking true diastolic function 1
  • Pseudonormalization (Grade II) shows normal E/A despite worse dysfunction than Grade I 1, 4

The most dangerous error: Assuming normal E/A ratio (0.8-1.5) means normal diastolic function when it may represent pseudonormalization with elevated filling pressures. Always check E/e', LA size, and consider Valsalva maneuver in this scenario 1.

Prognostic Implications

When E/A reversal occurs with other abnormalities indicating elevated filling pressures (restrictive pattern with E/A >2, deceleration time <150 msec), it predicts poor outcomes independently of systolic function in dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, and post-MI patients 2.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.