E/A Reversal and Diastolic Dysfunction
E/A reversal (E/A <1) indicates impaired left ventricular relaxation, which represents Grade I diastolic dysfunction, but it does NOT automatically mean clinically significant diastolic dysfunction or elevated filling pressures 1.
Understanding E/A Reversal in Context
The E/A ratio alone is insufficient to diagnose diastolic dysfunction because:
- Normal aging causes E/A reversal - Healthy elderly individuals commonly show E/A <1 due to age-related slowing of LV relaxation, mimicking mild diastolic dysfunction seen in younger patients 1
- E/A reversal represents only ONE stage in the spectrum of diastolic dysfunction
- Loading conditions heavily influence the E/A ratio, making it unreliable as a standalone measure
The Diastolic Dysfunction Spectrum
When diastolic dysfunction progresses, the E/A ratio follows a characteristic pattern 1:
Grade I (Impaired Relaxation): E/A <1 with normal filling pressures
- Prolonged deceleration time
- Prolonged IVRT
- This is what E/A reversal typically indicates
Grade II (Pseudonormal): E/A appears normal (0.8-1.5) BUT filling pressures are elevated
- Critical pitfall: Looks normal but represents worsening disease
- Can be unmasked with Valsalva maneuver (E/A decreases ≥50%) 1
Grade III (Restrictive): E/A >2 with markedly elevated filling pressures
- Shortened deceleration time (<150 msec)
- Associated with poor prognosis 2
What You Actually Need to Diagnose Diastolic Dysfunction
The 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines require a multiparametric approach 1:
Essential Additional Parameters:
- E/e' ratio: Average E/e' >14 indicates elevated filling pressures (more reliable than E/A alone)
- LA volume index: >34 mL/m² suggests chronically elevated pressures
- Peak TR velocity: >2.8 m/sec indicates elevated pulmonary pressures
- Pulmonary vein flow: Ar-A duration ≥30 msec suggests elevated LVEDP
The Algorithm:
- Measure E/A ratio AND septal/lateral e' velocities
- Calculate average E/e' ratio
- Assess LA volume index
- Measure TR velocity if present
- If ≥3 of 4 criteria are positive (E/e' >14, LA volume >34 mL/m², TR velocity >2.8 m/sec, E/A <0.8 with e' <7 cm/sec), diastolic dysfunction with elevated filling pressures is present 3
Critical Clinical Pitfalls
Do not diagnose diastolic dysfunction based solely on E/A reversal because:
- Young athletes may have E/A <1 due to enhanced atrial function (normal variant)
- Tachycardia causes E and A wave fusion, making E/A unreliable 1
- Mitral regurgitation artificially elevates E velocity, masking true diastolic function 1
- Pseudonormalization (Grade II) shows normal E/A despite worse dysfunction than Grade I 1, 4
The most dangerous error: Assuming normal E/A ratio (0.8-1.5) means normal diastolic function when it may represent pseudonormalization with elevated filling pressures. Always check E/e', LA size, and consider Valsalva maneuver in this scenario 1.
Prognostic Implications
When E/A reversal occurs with other abnormalities indicating elevated filling pressures (restrictive pattern with E/A >2, deceleration time <150 msec), it predicts poor outcomes independently of systolic function in dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, and post-MI patients 2.