Do most surgical centers have a backup plan for when near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring fails?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 1, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

NIRS Backup Planning in Surgical Centers

The provided evidence does not address whether most surgical centers have backup plans for NIRS monitoring failures, as NIRS is not considered standard monitoring in most centers and current guidelines do not mandate its use or specify contingency protocols 1.

Current State of NIRS Adoption

NIRS monitoring is not universally implemented across surgical centers:

  • Approximately 75% of German cardiac surgery perfusion departments do not use NIRS as standard monitoring, reserving it only for specific high-risk scenarios like aortic arch surgery or carotid stenosis 2
  • NIRS is typically used as an adjunctive rather than essential monitor, meaning its failure would not necessarily compromise patient safety when standard monitoring remains functional 3, 4

Standard Monitoring Requirements

The 2021 Association of Anaesthetists guidelines establish minimum essential monitoring standards that do not include NIRS 1:

Required monitors include:

  • Pulse oximetry
  • Capnography
  • ECG
  • Non-invasive blood pressure (at least every 5 minutes)
  • Airway pressure monitoring
  • Oxygen analyzer

These standard monitors serve as the primary safety net, making NIRS supplementary rather than critical to patient monitoring.

Clinical Reality of NIRS Failure

When NIRS monitoring is used, most interventions triggered by NIRS deviations (80%) occur alongside changes in standard monitoring parameters 3. This means:

  • Only 20% of NIRS-triggered interventions occur without concomitant standard monitoring changes 3
  • Standard monitoring parameters would detect most clinically significant events even if NIRS fails
  • The "backup plan" is essentially reverting to standard monitoring protocols that remain continuously active

Technical Limitations Requiring Awareness

NIRS has recognized limitations that clinicians must understand 5, 6:

  • Erroneous readings can occur due to altered tissue boundary conditions (air, blood between tissue layers, inadequate sensor depth)
  • Values may be technically challenging to interpret in neurosurgical settings
  • Motion artifact and workflow constraints affect reliability 7

Common pitfall: Relying solely on NIRS values without correlating with standard monitoring and clinical assessment can lead to inappropriate interventions or missed complications.

Practical Approach When NIRS Fails

Since formal backup protocols are not standardized, the practical approach involves:

  1. Continue with standard monitoring (pulse oximetry, capnography, blood pressure, ECG) which remains the foundation of patient safety 1
  2. Increase clinical vigilance for signs of cerebral hypoperfusion (pupillary changes, hemodynamic instability, end-tidal CO₂ changes)
  3. Consider alternative monitoring if clinically indicated (arterial blood gas analysis, jugular venous oxygen saturation in specific cases)
  4. Document the equipment failure and clinical decision-making

The absence of standardized backup protocols reflects NIRS's status as an adjunctive rather than essential monitor - most centers do not have formal contingency plans because NIRS failure does not fundamentally compromise the minimum monitoring standards required for safe anesthesia care.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.