Side Effects Profile of Relatlimab Combined with Nivolumab
Relatlimab combined with nivolumab demonstrates a favorable safety profile with grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurring in 18.9-23% of patients, significantly lower than nivolumab plus ipilimumab (61-73%), though higher than nivolumab monotherapy (9.7-11.1%). 1
Overall Toxicity Profile
The combination shows moderate toxicity with manageable immune-related adverse events:
- Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs): 18.9-21.1% 1, 2
- Any-grade TRAEs leading to discontinuation: 17% 3
- Notably, no grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were reported in the neoadjuvant setting (n=30 patients) 4
This represents a middle ground between the lower toxicity of nivolumab monotherapy (9.7% grade 3-4 TRAEs) and the substantially higher toxicity of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (61% grade 3-4 TRAEs) 3.
Specific Organ System Toxicities
Endocrine System - Critical Concern
Adrenal insufficiency occurs at unexpectedly high rates (8%) with relatlimab-nivolumab, representing an 8-fold increase compared to nivolumab monotherapy (<1%) 5. This is likely secondary to hypophysitis and represents the most significant safety signal for this combination.
Key clinical features:
- Median onset after 7 doses (range 4-10)
- Presenting symptoms: fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting
- Risk increases with cumulative dosing
- No additional anterior pituitary deficiencies typically develop 5
Cardiac System - Emerging Risk
Relatlimab-nivolumab shows increased cardiac-specific risks compared to other ICI combinations 6:
- Myocarditis (ROR = 2.84 for cardiac disorders)
- Troponin elevation
- Vascular disorders (ROR = 2.04)
This contrasts with nivolumab-ipilimumab, which shows lower cardiac toxicity but higher gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and respiratory toxicities 6.
Gastrointestinal, Hepatic, and Respiratory
Lower rates compared to nivolumab-ipilimumab 6:
- Reduced colitis risk (ROR = 1.39 for nivo-ipi vs baseline for nivo-rela)
- Less hepatitis (ROR = 2.32 for nivo-ipi)
- Fewer pneumonitis cases (ROR = 1.18 for nivo-ipi)
Ophthalmologic - Rare but Severe
Complete color vision loss has been reported as a rare but potentially irreversible complication 7:
- Bilateral serous macular detachment
- Persistent "black and white vision" despite treatment
- Likely represents direct photoreceptor or retinal ganglion cell toxicity
- Onset after as few as 2 doses
Temporal Pattern
80% of adverse events occur within 3 months of treatment initiation 6:
- Median time-to-onset: 57 days for relatlimab-nivolumab
- Comparable to nivolumab-ipilimumab (42 days, p=0.66)
- Most intensive monitoring should occur in first 12 weeks
Safety in Special Contexts
Neoadjuvant Setting
Exceptionally favorable profile in the neoadjuvant context 4:
- 0% grade 3-4 irAEs in 30 patients
- 57% pathologic complete response rate
- Supports use in perioperative setting
With Concurrent Local Therapy
Safe combination with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases 8:
- No symptomatic radiation necrosis reported
- 75% of patients received concurrent local therapy
- Median CNS-PFS of 5.3 months
Clinical Decision Algorithm
Choose relatlimab-nivolumab when:
- Patient requires combination immunotherapy efficacy
- Patient has contraindications to high-dose corticosteroids (needed more often with nivo-ipi)
- Lower gastrointestinal/hepatic toxicity risk is priority
- Neoadjuvant setting where minimal toxicity is essential
Avoid or use extreme caution when:
- Pre-existing cardiac disease (consider nivo-ipi instead)
- History of pituitary/adrenal disorders
- Baseline visual impairment where color vision loss would be catastrophic
- Patient cannot tolerate frequent endocrine monitoring
Monitoring Requirements
Mandatory surveillance:
- Cortisol/ACTH assessment at baseline and with any fatigue, nausea, or hypotension (given 8% adrenal insufficiency risk)
- Cardiac biomarkers (troponin) at baseline and with symptoms
- Ophthalmologic evaluation if any visual changes
- Most intensive monitoring in first 3 months when 80% of events occur
The safety profile remains consistent with longer follow-up (minimum 57.3 months), with no new safety signals emerging over time 9.