What are the King's College criteria for urgent liver transplantation in patients with acute non‑paracetamol poisoning?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 6, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

King's College Criteria for Non-Paracetamol Acute Liver Failure

The King's College criteria for non-paracetamol acute liver failure requiring urgent liver transplantation are: INR >6.5 (PT >100 seconds) OR any three of the following five variables: age <10 or >40 years, non-A/non-B hepatitis, halothane hepatitis, drug-induced liver injury, or jaundice-to-encephalopathy interval >7 days.

The Specific Criteria

For non-paracetamol poisoning, the King's College Hospital criteria indicate poor prognosis and potential need for emergency liver transplantation when:

  • INR >6.5 (or prothrombin time >100 seconds) alone, OR
  • Any three of five of the following:
    • Age <10 years or >40 years
    • Etiology: non-A, non-B hepatitis, halothane hepatitis, or idiosyncratic drug reaction
    • Jaundice to encephalopathy interval >7 days (indicating subacute liver failure)
    • INR >3.5
    • Bilirubin >300 μmol/L (>17.5 mg/dL)

Performance Characteristics and Clinical Context

The King's College criteria have good specificity (82%) but limited sensitivity (68%) for predicting mortality in non-paracetamol acute liver failure 1. This means they are better at identifying who will survive than who will die without transplantation.

Critical performance nuances:

  • Specificity is highest (93%) when applied to patients with high-grade hepatic encephalopathy (grade III-IV) 1
  • Dynamic application through the clinical course improves specificity to 88% 1
  • Sensitivity has decreased in modern studies (58% post-2005 vs 85% pre-1995), suggesting improved medical management allows more patients to survive without transplantation 1

Comparative Accuracy

A meta-analysis comparing prognostic models found that for non-paracetamol acute liver failure, MELD score (DOR 8.42) outperforms King's College criteria (DOR 4.16) in predicting mortality 2. However, King's College criteria remain widely used due to their simplicity and established track record.

Important Clinical Caveats

Encephalopathy should not be an absolute prerequisite for transplant listing 3. In certain etiologies like Amanita phalloides poisoning, patients may meet transplant criteria before developing encephalopathy.

Prothrombin index <10% (approximately INR >6) from day 4 onwards after acute liver injury has 100% accuracy for predicting fatal outcome in some studies 3.

Recent data challenges these criteria: A 2026 study found that among patients meeting King's College criteria, 58% had spontaneous liver regeneration and only 36.8% died, with one-year transplant-free survival exceeding 80% 4. This suggests the criteria may overestimate transplant need in the modern intensive care era.

Practical Application Algorithm

  1. Immediate assessment: Calculate INR and identify etiology
  2. If INR >6.5: Patient meets criteria - initiate transplant evaluation
  3. If INR 3.5-6.5: Assess the five variables above
    • If ≥3 present: Patient meets criteria - initiate transplant evaluation
    • If <3 present: Continue monitoring, reassess daily
  4. Apply dynamically: Reassess criteria every 24 hours as clinical course evolves
  5. Priority for transplant listing: Patients with high-grade encephalopathy (III-IV), autoimmune hepatitis, or seronegative hepatitis 4

Etiology-Specific Considerations

Patients less likely to need transplantation despite meeting criteria: acetaminophen-induced (92.3% spontaneous regeneration) and ischemic acute liver failure 4, 5.

Patients more likely to need transplantation: autoimmune hepatitis, seronegative hepatitis, non-paracetamol drug toxicity, and subacute liver failure 6.

All patients meeting King's College criteria should be managed in a transplant center regardless of immediate listing decision, as clinical deterioration can be rapid 7.

Related Questions

What is the primary (first) criterion of the King's College criteria for acute liver failure in non‑acetaminophen (non‑paracetamol) and acetaminophen‑induced cases?
What is the appropriate management for a 22‑year‑old patient with acute fulminant hepatitis?
What is the appropriate evaluation and management for a 27-year-old breastfeeding woman with a six-month history of daily unilateral throbbing headache behind the right eye associated with photophobia despite acetaminophen use?
For a 2‑month‑old infant weighing 3.5 kg, what dose of intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen) should be administered?
How should an 18-year-old male who ingested 12 g of acetaminophen (paracetamol) over 14 hours be managed?
How should the arterial blood gas showing normal pH, elevated PaCO₂ (hypercapnia), adequate PaO₂, low oxygen saturation, normal bicarbonate, high base excess, and low hemoglobin be interpreted and managed in a patient on BiPAP with IPAP 12 cm H₂O, EPAP 5 cm H₂O, tidal volume ≈400 mL, respiratory rate 16, minute ventilation 6.6 L/min, FiO₂ 35%?
Is daily supplementation of vitamin K2 safe for children?
What is the recommended outpatient management for a patient with a PRADS (Pneumonia Risk Assessment Decision Support) score of 3?
What is the appropriate medical management for benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate)?
What does a PI-RADS 3 prostate lesion indicate and how should it be managed?
What are the latest antiretroviral medications for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the expected life expectancy for adults on these regimens?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.