What are Gurd's criteria for diagnosing Fat Embolism Syndrome (FES)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

Gurd's criteria for diagnosing Fat Embolism Syndrome (FES) consist of major and minor criteria, requiring at least one major criterion plus four minor criteria, or two major criteria plus two minor criteria for diagnosis. The major criteria include petechial rash, respiratory symptoms with radiographic changes, and central nervous system signs. Minor criteria include tachycardia (heart rate >110 beats per minute), fever (temperature >38.5°C), retinal changes (fat or petechiae), jaundice, renal changes (oliguria, anuria, or lipiduria), thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150,000/mm³), anemia (unexplained drop in hemoglobin), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and fat macroglobulinemia.

These criteria help clinicians identify FES, which typically occurs 24-72 hours after trauma, most commonly following long bone fractures. The pathophysiology involves mechanical obstruction of blood vessels by fat globules and biochemical injury from free fatty acids. Early recognition using these criteria is crucial as FES can progress rapidly, with mortality rates of 5-15% 1. Treatment is primarily supportive, focusing on respiratory support, hemodynamic stabilization, and addressing the underlying cause.

Some key points to consider when using Gurd's criteria include:

  • The importance of a high index of suspicion for FES in patients with traumatic fractures, especially those having undergone an invasive orthopedic procedure 2
  • The need for supportive management, including respiratory support and hemodynamic stabilization, in patients with FES 3
  • The potential for FES to be a self-limiting condition, with most patients recovering with supportive care 1
  • The lack of a single test for diagnosing FES, making clinical criteria such as Gurd's essential for diagnosis 1

Overall, Gurd's criteria remain a valuable tool for diagnosing FES, and their use can help clinicians provide timely and effective treatment for this potentially life-threatening condition 4, 5.

References

Research

Fat embolism syndrome: clinical and imaging considerations: case report and review of literature.

Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2008

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.