What is the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for treating central post-stroke pain (CPSP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) shows moderate efficacy for treating central post-stroke pain (CPSP), with repetitive TMS (rTMS) being the most promising approach. The most recent and highest quality study, published in 2023 1, suggests that high-frequency rTMS applied to the primary motor cortex contralateral to the painful side typically provides the best results.

Key Findings

  • A standard protocol involves 10-20 daily sessions of rTMS at 10 Hz frequency, 80-90% of motor threshold intensity, with 1500-3000 pulses per session.
  • Pain reduction typically ranges from 20-40% in responsive patients, with effects lasting from several days to weeks after a treatment course.
  • Maintenance sessions may be required every 2-4 weeks to sustain benefits.
  • TMS works by modulating neural activity in pain processing pathways, reducing hyperexcitability and restoring inhibitory mechanisms disrupted by stroke.

Considerations

  • The treatment is generally safe with minimal side effects like headache or scalp discomfort.
  • However, response rates vary significantly between patients, and TMS should be considered as part of a comprehensive pain management approach rather than a standalone treatment.
  • Patients should be evaluated for contraindications such as seizure history, metal implants, or pregnancy before beginning treatment.

Additional Insights

  • A case study published in 2021 2 reported the efficacy of rTMS for acute central post-stroke pain, highlighting the potential benefits of early intervention.
  • Another study published in 2016 3 discussed the importance of considering the impact of anatomically disrupted neural tissues on the location, orientation, and magnitude of exogenously applied currents during neurostimulation treatments.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.