Does a higher D-dimer (D-dimer) level correlate with a higher probability of pulmonary embolism (PE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Yes, a higher D-dimer level generally correlates with a higher probability of pulmonary embolism (PE), though the relationship is not perfectly linear. D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product that increases when blood clots are being actively broken down in the body. In patients with suspected PE, D-dimer testing is most valuable as a "rule-out" test due to its high sensitivity but limited specificity. A normal D-dimer level (typically <500 ng/mL, though age-adjusted cutoffs are often used for older patients) effectively excludes PE in patients with low to moderate clinical probability, as suggested by the American College of Physicians 1. However, as D-dimer levels increase above the threshold, the positive predictive value improves somewhat, meaning very elevated levels (such as >4000 ng/mL) are more concerning for PE than borderline elevations.

Key Considerations

  • D-dimer can be elevated in many other conditions including infection, inflammation, cancer, pregnancy, and recent surgery, which limits its specificity 1.
  • Clinical assessment tools like the Wells score or PERC rule should be used alongside D-dimer testing to improve diagnostic accuracy, as recommended by the American College of Physicians 1.
  • Patients with high clinical suspicion or significantly elevated D-dimer levels should undergo imaging studies like CT pulmonary angiography for definitive diagnosis of PE, in line with guidelines from the European Heart Journal 1 and the American College of Physicians 1.

Diagnostic Approach

  • For patients with low pretest probability of PE, the PERC criteria should be applied, and if all criteria are met, D-dimer testing is not necessary, as stated in the guidelines from the American College of Physicians 1.
  • For patients with intermediate pretest probability of PE, D-dimer testing is warranted, and a normal D-dimer level can effectively rule out PE, while an elevated level should prompt imaging studies, as suggested by the American College of Physicians 1.
  • For patients with high pretest probability of PE, imaging studies with CT pulmonary angiography should be performed directly, without the need for D-dimer testing, as recommended by the European Heart Journal 1 and the American College of Physicians 1.

From the Research

Correlation between D-dimer levels and Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

  • A higher D-dimer level is associated with a higher probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) 2, 3, 4.
  • The study by 2 found that patients with central embolisms in the pulmonary trunk or arteries had higher average D-dimer levels (7.1 mg/L) compared to those with no PE (3.6 mg/L) or peripheral PE (4.3 mg/L).
  • Another study by 3 found that patients who died from PE had higher median D-dimer levels (4578 vs 2946 microg/l) than those who survived, and mortality increased with increasing D-dimer levels.
  • The study by 4 found that patients with D-dimer levels higher than 2,152 ng/mL had a significantly increased risk of PE, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 53% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82%.

Diagnostic Accuracy of D-dimer levels

  • D-dimer levels can be used to exclude PE in low-risk patients, with a high negative predictive value (NPV) 5, 6.
  • A study by 5 found that managing patients with suspected PE based on pretest probability and D-dimer result is safe and decreases the need for diagnostic imaging, with a negative predictive value of 99.5% for the combined strategy.
  • Another study by 6 found that a plasma D-dimer concentration below 500 micrograms/L allows the exclusion of PE in 29% of outpatients suspected of having PE, with a negative predictive value of 99%.

Clinical Implications

  • The use of D-dimer levels in combination with clinical probability and imaging results can improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency for PE 2.
  • Establishing reliable D-dimer cutoff values may help clinicians better stratify patient risk and make informed decisions about the need for imaging 2.
  • Patients with higher D-dimer levels may require closer monitoring and more aggressive treatment, while those with lower levels may be at lower risk of PE 3, 4.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.