From the Guidelines
The optimal timing for resuming anticoagulants after major surgery is typically 48-72 hours postoperatively, depending on the specific anticoagulant, bleeding risk, and thrombotic risk, as suggested by the most recent and highest quality study 1. When considering the resumption of anticoagulants after major surgery, several factors must be taken into account, including the type of anticoagulant, the patient's bleeding risk, and their thrombotic risk.
- For patients on warfarin, resumption can generally begin 12-24 hours after surgery once hemostasis is achieved, starting with the patient's usual maintenance dose.
- For direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) like apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban, resumption is typically recommended 48-72 hours after major surgery, as outlined in a suggested management approach 1.
- Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) like enoxaparin can often be restarted 24 hours after surgery, but delayed resumption for at least 24 h and probably longer (48-72 h) in patients undergoing major surgery is recommended, with resumption contingent on clinical evidence of surgical-site hemostasis, as suggested by observational studies 1. Some key considerations include:
- Patients with high thrombotic risk (recent venous thromboembolism, mechanical heart valves) may need earlier resumption with bridging therapy using LMWH.
- Procedures with high bleeding risk (neurosurgery, spinal surgery) may require delayed anticoagulation resumption. The balance between premature anticoagulation, which can cause bleeding complications, and delayed resumption, which increases thrombotic risk, is crucial, and close monitoring for both bleeding and thrombotic complications is essential during the perioperative period, as emphasized by the American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines 1.
From the FDA Drug Label
Apixaban tablets should be restarted after the surgical or other procedures as soon as adequate hemostasis has been established.
For patients undergoing hip replacement surgery, the recommended duration of treatment is 35 days. For patients undergoing knee replacement surgery, the recommended duration of treatment is 12 days
The initial dose should be taken 12 to 24 hours after surgery.
10 mg once daily for 35 days, 6–10 hours after surgery once hemostasis has been established
The optimal timing for resuming anticoagulants after major surgery is as soon as adequate hemostasis has been established.
- For hip replacement surgery, treatment should be started 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 35 days.
- For knee replacement surgery, treatment should be started 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 12 days.
- The dose should be taken 6-10 hours after surgery once hemostasis has been established 2 3.
From the Research
Landmark Trials for Resuming Anticoagulants after Major Surgery
The optimal timing for resuming anticoagulants after major surgery is a critical consideration to balance the risks of thromboembolism and bleeding. Several studies have investigated this issue:
- A 2003 study 4 suggests that oral anticoagulant therapy should be interrupted for as short a time as possible, usually 4 or 5 days, and that bridging therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin or therapeutic-dose subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) can be given to reduce the risk of thromboembolism.
- A 2012 study 5 discusses the role of new anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopaedic surgery and in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients, highlighting the potential benefits of newer oral anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran etexilate.
- A 2016 review 6 emphasizes the importance of risk stratification and perioperative management of patients receiving anticoagulant therapy, noting that clinical judgment is often needed due to the lack of randomized clinical trial data.
Specific Considerations for Resuming Anticoagulation
When considering resuming anticoagulation after major surgery, the following points are relevant:
- A 1995 study 7 compared the efficacy and safety of adjusted-dose oral anticoagulants versus fixed-dose subcutaneous LMWH for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis in patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement, finding that LMWH was at least as efficacious and safe as oral anticoagulants.
- A 2015 article 8 provides a practical framework for individualizing the resumption of anticoagulation after hemorrhage, acknowledging the lack of evidence-based guidelines for these situations.
Key Findings and Implications
The available evidence suggests that:
- The timing and strategy for resuming anticoagulation after major surgery should be individualized based on the patient's risk of thromboembolism and bleeding 4, 6.
- Newer oral anticoagulants may offer advantages over traditional anticoagulants in certain situations 5.
- Clinical judgment and risk stratification are essential in the perioperative management of patients receiving anticoagulant therapy 6.