What is the best imaging modality for a suspected complicated wound infection to the leg?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

For a suspected complicated wound infection to the leg, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the best imaging modality. This recommendation is based on the most recent and highest quality study available, which emphasizes the importance of accurate diagnosis and management of complicated wound infections to reduce morbidity, mortality, and improve quality of life 1.

Key Considerations

  • MRI provides excellent soft tissue contrast and can accurately detect the extent of infection, including abscess formation, osteomyelitis, necrotizing fasciitis, and deep tissue involvement that may not be apparent on physical examination.
  • It can distinguish between soft tissue edema, fluid collections, and devitalized tissue, which is crucial for surgical planning.
  • Unlike CT scans, MRI does not use ionizing radiation and offers superior contrast resolution for soft tissues.
  • While ultrasound may be used initially for superficial infections, it cannot reliably assess deeper structures.
  • CT scans with contrast can be an alternative when MRI is contraindicated (such as in patients with certain metallic implants or severe claustrophobia) or unavailable, but they provide less detailed soft tissue information.

Evidence Summary

The American College of Radiology (ACR) appropriateness criteria for suspected osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, or soft tissue infection (excluding spine and diabetic foot) support the use of MRI as the preferred imaging modality for suspected soft tissue infection in the leg 1. The 2022 update of these criteria further emphasizes the role of MRI in evaluating complicated wound infections, particularly in cases with high clinical suspicion of necrotizing fasciitis or soft tissue gas 1.

Clinical Implications

In clinical practice, the choice of imaging modality should be guided by the need for accurate diagnosis and effective management of complicated wound infections. MRI is the preferred imaging choice for guiding appropriate management decisions, given its ability to comprehensively evaluate the extent of infection and involvement of deeper structures 1.

From the Research

Imaging Modalities for Complicated Wound Infection to the Leg

The best imaging modality for a suspected complicated wound infection to the leg can be determined based on the following factors:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): MRI is considered the ideal technique for displaying soft-tissue abnormalities produced by infectious processes 2. It allows for the detection of signal intensity changes that reflect the increased water content of the soft tissues induced by inflammatory reactions. MRI is highly sensitive and specific in detecting common findings of musculoskeletal infections, such as soft tissue edema, joint effusions, and bone marrow edema 3.
  • Computed Tomography (CT): CT is useful in detecting soft-tissue gas and can provide excellent anatomic resolution and soft tissue contrast 4. However, it is generally less sensitive than MRI for the detection of bone infection.
  • Other Imaging Modalities: Other imaging modalities, such as conventional radiography, sonography, and nuclear medicine, can also be used to evaluate musculoskeletal infections. However, they may have limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Modality

The advantages and disadvantages of each modality are:

  • MRI:
    • Advantages: highly sensitive and specific, excellent soft tissue contrast, can detect bone marrow edema and soft tissue abscesses.
    • Disadvantages: may not be available in all settings, can be expensive.
  • CT:
    • Advantages: excellent anatomic resolution, can detect soft-tissue gas.
    • Disadvantages: generally less sensitive than MRI for bone infection, may expose patients to radiation.
  • Other Modalities:
    • Advantages: may be more readily available, less expensive.
    • Disadvantages: may have limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion is not allowed, so the response will continue with more details

The choice of imaging modality depends on the specific clinical scenario and the availability of resources. In general, MRI is considered the best imaging modality for evaluating complicated wound infections to the leg due to its high sensitivity and specificity 3, 5. However, CT and other imaging modalities can also be useful in certain situations. It is essential to consider the advantages and disadvantages of each modality and to choose the best approach based on the individual patient's needs. As stated in 6, MRI was compared with computed tomography in 12 cases and with 111In-labeled leukocytes scans in 22, and it was found that MRI detected 92% of proved infections.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

MR imaging of soft-tissue infection.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America, 1995

Research

Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal infections.

Polish journal of radiology, 2022

Research

CT and MRI evaluation of musculoskeletal infection.

Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging, 1997

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.