From the Research
Royal Reid's frequency cancer killing invention is not an effective treatment for cancer. There is no scientific evidence supporting the claim that frequencies can kill cancer cells in the human body. This type of treatment falls into the category of unproven alternative therapies that lack rigorous clinical testing and validation through peer-reviewed research. Cancer requires evidence-based treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapies that have been thoroughly tested in clinical trials and approved by regulatory agencies, as discussed in 1.
Established Treatments
These established treatments have demonstrated efficacy and safety profiles, with known benefits and risks. For example, radiation therapy remains an important component of cancer treatment, with approximately 50% of all cancer patients receiving radiation therapy during their course of illness, contributing towards 40% of curative treatment for cancer 1.
Lack of Evidence for Frequency-Based Treatments
Claims about frequency-based cancer treatments often rely on pseudoscientific concepts that contradict our understanding of cancer biology and physics. While there is some research into the effects of electromagnetic fields on cancer cells, such as the study in 2 which found that low-intensity and frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields can selectively impair breast cancer cell viability, this does not provide sufficient evidence to support the use of frequency-based treatments as a primary treatment for cancer.
Recommendation
Patients considering cancer treatment should consult with qualified oncologists who can recommend appropriate, evidence-based therapies tailored to their specific type and stage of cancer. Delaying proven medical treatment in favor of unproven alternatives can allow cancer to progress, potentially reducing chances for successful treatment outcomes. As highlighted in 3, emerging strategies in cancer therapy combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy show promise, but these are evidence-based approaches that have undergone rigorous testing.
Key Points
- Cancer treatment should be based on evidence-based therapies.
- Established treatments have demonstrated efficacy and safety profiles.
- Frequency-based cancer treatments lack rigorous clinical testing and validation.
- Patients should consult with qualified oncologists for appropriate treatment recommendations.
- Delaying proven medical treatment can reduce chances for successful outcomes, as discussed in the context of various treatments in 4 and 5.