What is the best initial imaging for suspected endocarditis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the best initial imaging modality for suspected endocarditis. When a patient presents with symptoms suggestive of infective endocarditis such as fever, new heart murmur, or embolic phenomena, TTE should be performed promptly as it is non-invasive, widely available, and can visualize vegetations, valvular damage, and complications like abscess formation [ 1 ]. TTE has a sensitivity of approximately 70% for detecting vegetations and can identify predisposing conditions such as valvular abnormalities.

Key Points to Consider

  • If TTE is negative but clinical suspicion remains high, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) should be pursued as the next step due to its higher sensitivity (>90%) and better ability to detect smaller vegetations (<3mm), prosthetic valve endocarditis, and perivalvular complications [ 1 ].
  • The timing of echocardiography is important - it should be obtained early in the evaluation, ideally before or shortly after initiating empiric antibiotics, to maximize diagnostic yield and guide appropriate management decisions [ 1 ].
  • TEE is recommended in all patients with clinical suspicion of IE and a negative or non-diagnostic TTE [ 1 ].
  • Repeat TTE and/or TEE within 5–7 days is recommended in case of initially negative examination when clinical suspicion of IE remains high [ 1 ].
  • The use of TEE has been shown to have up to a 98.6% negative predictive value (NPV) in suspected infective endocarditis [ 1 ].

Additional Considerations

  • The size and other characteristics of vegetations on echocardiography have been shown to be useful in predicting complications such as peripheral embolization [ 1 ].
  • In left-sided native valve S. aureus endocarditis, the presence of an intracardiac abscess and left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% on echocardiography has been shown to be independent predictors of in-hospital mortality [ 1 ].
  • The ability of echocardiographic features to predict embolic events is limited, but large (≥10 mm) vegetations on the anterior mitral leaflet are associated with a higher risk of embolic complications [ 1 ].

Recent Guidelines

  • A recent expert panel statement recommends the use of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography as the first-line imaging tests in suspected endocarditis and for assessing hemodynamic complications [ 1 ].
  • Cardiac computed tomography angiography and functional imaging with FDG PET/CT have an incremental role in technically limited or inconclusive cases on echocardiography [ 1 ].

From the Research

Initial Imaging for Suspected Endocarditis

The best initial imaging for suspected endocarditis is a topic of interest due to the varying diagnostic accuracies of different imaging modalities.

  • Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is often considered the first line of imaging due to its non-invasive nature and wide availability 2.
  • A study from 2007 found that TTE with harmonic imaging had a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 88% for detecting vegetations in patients with an intermediate likelihood of native valve infective endocarditis 2.
  • However, a meta-analysis from 2017 found that harmonic TTE had a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 94% for detecting vegetations, with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.42 3.
  • Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is generally considered more sensitive than TTE, especially for detecting small vegetations or those on prosthetic valves 4, 5.
  • A study from 2023 found that contemporary TEE imaging had improved diagnostic performance for infective endocarditis, with a sensitivity of 95.3% compared to 85.7% in 2011 6.
  • The choice of initial imaging modality may depend on the patient's clinical presentation, the presence of prosthetic valves, and the availability of TEE 3, 5.

Comparison of Imaging Modalities

  • TTE is generally less sensitive than TEE but is non-invasive and widely available 2, 3.
  • TEE is more sensitive than TTE, especially for detecting small vegetations or those on prosthetic valves, but is more invasive and may not be necessary for all patients 4, 5.
  • The use of harmonic imaging and modern echocardiography technology may improve the diagnostic accuracy of TTE 2, 3.
  • Three-dimensional (3D) technology and higher frame rates/resolution may also improve the diagnostic performance of TEE 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.