What is the role of triple therapy in treating Aplastic Anemia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

There are no official guidelines to assist in answering this question. I will search for relevant research papers instead.

From the Research

Role of Triple Therapy in Treating Aplastic Anemia

  • The treatment of aplastic anemia involves supportive therapy and aplastic anemia-specific therapy to recover from hematopoiesis 1.
  • Aplastic anemia-specific treatments include immunosuppressive therapy, thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) treatment, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and anabolic hormone therapy 1.
  • The most effective drug therapy is the combination of TPO-RA and immunotherapy combined with anti-thymocyte globulin and cyclosporine 1.
  • Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is the first choice for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) limitation 2.
  • Eltrombopag (EPAG), a small molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, can stimulate the proliferation of residual hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC) and restore the bone marrow hematopoietic function of patients 2.
  • The combination of IST and EPAG has been shown to have higher overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) compared to IST alone 2, 3.
  • The addition of eltrombopag to immunosuppressive therapy was associated with markedly higher rates of hematologic response among patients with severe aplastic anemia than in a historical cohort 3.
  • Triple therapy, including immunosuppressive therapy, TPO-RA, and other agents, may be effective in treating aplastic anemia, but the optimal combination and duration of therapy need to be determined 2, 3, 4.

Key Findings

  • The overall response rates at 6 months were higher in patients treated with IST and EPAG compared to IST alone 2, 3.
  • The complete response rates at 6 months were also higher in patients treated with IST and EPAG compared to IST alone 2, 3.
  • The addition of EPAG to IST enabled patients to achieve earlier and faster hematologic responses with a higher rate of complete response 2.
  • The treatment choice for aplastic anemia is made based on the disease severity and patient age 1, 5.

Treatment Outcomes

  • The probability of an overall 10-year survival rate was 90% in patients treated with combined immunosuppressive therapy 4.
  • The survival rate was 97% at a median follow-up of 2 years in patients treated with IST and EPAG 3.
  • The rates of relapse and clonal evolution were similar to historical experience in patients treated with IST and EPAG 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.