From the Guidelines
Ticagrelor is generally preferred over clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients not undergoing revascularization intervention. The recommended dosage for ticagrelor is a 180 mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily, administered with low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg daily) 1. This dual antiplatelet therapy should typically be continued for 12 months after the ACS event.
Key Considerations
- Ticagrelor demonstrates superior efficacy in reducing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke compared to clopidogrel, with a more predictable antiplatelet effect as it does not require hepatic activation 1.
- However, ticagrelor is associated with increased non-CABG-related bleeding risk and may cause dyspnea in some patients.
- It is contraindicated in patients with history of intracranial hemorrhage, severe hepatic impairment, or those taking strong CYP3A inhibitors/inducers.
Alternative Options
- For patients with high bleeding risk, financial constraints, or compliance concerns with twice-daily dosing, clopidogrel (300-600 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg daily) remains a reasonable alternative 1.
- The choice between these medications should ultimately consider individual patient factors including bleeding risk, compliance ability, comorbidities, and cost considerations.
Guideline Recommendations
- The 2020 ESC guidelines recommend ticagrelor over clopidogrel for patients with ACS managed with medical therapy alone, unless the bleeding risk outweighs the potential ischemic benefit 1.
- The 2024 ESC guidelines suggest that in patients without prior MI or revascularization but with evidence of significant obstructive CAD, aspirin 75–100 mg daily is recommended lifelong, and adding a second antithrombotic agent to aspirin for extended long-term secondary prevention should be considered in patients at enhanced ischemic risk and without high bleeding risk 1.
From the Research
Comparison of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel
- Ticagrelor has a faster onset and more potent antiplatelet effect compared to clopidogrel 2, 3, 4.
- The PLATO trial showed that ticagrelor had a significantly greater reduction in death rate from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared to clopidogrel, without a significant increase in major bleeding 5.
- However, ticagrelor was associated with a higher rate of non-procedure-related bleeding, dyspnea, and ventricular pauses in the first week of treatment 4, 5.
Patient-Specific Considerations
- Ticagrelor is recommended for moderate-to-high risk ACS patients, including those with chronic kidney disease, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, and the elderly 2.
- Patients with a history of intracranial hemorrhage, moderate-to-severe hepatic impairment, high bleeding risk, or those treated with oral anticoagulants should avoid ticagrelor 2.
- Dyspnea is a common side effect of ticagrelor, and clinicians should consider other potential causes before discontinuing the medication 2.
Real-World Evidence
- A single-institution registry study found similar rates of 1-year all-cause mortality between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, with treatment not being a predictor of death or cardiovascular death 6.
- The study suggests that real-world outcomes may differ from clinical trial results, and that patient-specific factors such as age, end-stage renal disease, and pre-existing heart failure may have a greater impact on mortality 6.