What laboratory tests are used to diagnose mononucleosis (mono)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Mononucleosis is typically diagnosed using a combination of laboratory tests, including the heterophile antibody test (Monospot), EBV-specific serologic testing, complete blood count (CBC), and liver function tests. To diagnose mononucleosis, the following laboratory tests are recommended:

  • Heterophile antibody test (Monospot) to detect heterophile antibodies produced in response to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection 1
  • EBV-specific serologic testing, including IgM antibodies to viral capsid antigen (VCA-IgM) and IgG antibodies to VCA and Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA), to determine the stage of infection 1
  • Complete blood count (CBC) to show an elevated white blood cell count with a high percentage of atypical lymphocytes (more than 10%), which is characteristic of mono 1
  • Liver function tests to detect mild liver inflammation with elevated liver enzymes, which is often caused by mono 1 If EBV tests are negative but mono is still suspected, testing for cytomegalovirus (CMV) may be performed, as it can cause a similar illness 1. It's essential to note that the Monospot test may be negative early in the illness or in children under 4 years old, and false-negative results may occur in approximately 10% of patients 1. In such cases, EBV-specific serologic testing can provide a definitive diagnosis 1.

From the Research

Laboratory Tests for Diagnosing Mononucleosis

To diagnose mononucleosis, several laboratory tests can be used, including:

  • Complete blood count (CBC) with differential to assess for greater than 40% lymphocytes and greater than 10% atypical lymphocytes 2
  • Rapid heterophile antibody test, which has a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 91% 2
  • Epstein-Barr viral capsid antigen-antibody testing, which is more sensitive and specific but more expensive and takes longer to process than the rapid heterophile antibody test 2, 3
  • Serologic testing for antibodies to viral capsid antigens, which is recommended when confirmation of the diagnosis is required in patients with a negative mono-spot test 4
  • Testing for specific IgM and IgG antibodies against viral capsid antigens, early antigens, and EBV nuclear antigen proteins 5

Interpretation of Laboratory Results

When interpreting laboratory results, it is essential to consider the following:

  • The heterophile antibody test can have a false-negative result in children younger than five years and in adults during the first week of illness 2
  • The presence of elevated liver enzymes increases clinical suspicion for infectious mononucleosis in the setting of a negative heterophile antibody test result 2
  • The diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis may be made when IgG-VCA, IgM-VCA, and anti-D antibodies are present and EBNA antibodies are absent 3
  • The lymphocyte to white cell count ratio is not sufficient to diagnose or exclude infectious mononucleosis 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Infectious Mononucleosis: Rapid Evidence Review.

American family physician, 2023

Research

Infectious Mononucleosis: An Updated Review.

Current pediatric reviews, 2024

Research

Challenging the use of the lymphocyte to white cell count ratio in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis by analysis of a large cohort of Monospot test results.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.