What is the recommended fluid for hemorrhagic shock?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The recommended fluid for hemorrhagic shock is initially crystalloid solutions, specifically balanced crystalloids like lactated Ringer's solution or Plasma-Lyte, administered as a 1-2 L bolus for adults. This approach is supported by recent guidelines 1 that suggest using balanced crystalloids rather than 0.9% NaCl as first-line fluid therapy to reduce mortality and/or adverse renal events in patients with hemorrhagic shock.

The rationale behind this recommendation is based on the potentially deleterious effects of high-volume chloride-rich solutions on renal function and survival, as highlighted in a study published in Anaesthesia 1. Although the study notes that present-day data do not suffice to justify a GRADE 1 recommendation of a given type of crystalloid solution in cases of hemorrhagic shock, it emphasizes the importance of considering the potentially harmful effects of chloride-rich solutions.

If bleeding continues and the patient remains unstable after initial crystalloid resuscitation, blood products should be given, ideally as part of a massive transfusion protocol with a 1:1:1 ratio of packed red blood cells (PRBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelets. This balanced approach helps address both volume depletion and coagulopathy, as discussed in guidelines for managing massive hemorrhage 1. Crystalloids work by temporarily expanding intravascular volume, while blood products restore oxygen-carrying capacity and clotting factors.

Key considerations in the management of hemorrhagic shock include:

  • Avoiding vasopressors until adequate volume resuscitation has been achieved to prevent worsening tissue perfusion in hypovolemic states.
  • Implementing permissive hypotension with a target systolic blood pressure around 80-90 mmHg to avoid dislodging forming clots while ensuring organ perfusion.
  • Following a major hemorrhage protocol that includes clinical, laboratory, and logistic responses, as outlined in guidelines for the management of massive hemorrhage 1.

Overall, the goal of fluid resuscitation in hemorrhagic shock is to maintain adequate tissue perfusion while definitive measures to control bleeding are implemented, with a focus on minimizing morbidity, mortality, and improving quality of life.

From the Research

Fluid Resuscitation for Hemorrhagic Shock

The recommended fluid for hemorrhagic shock is a topic of ongoing debate and research. Several studies have investigated the use of different fluids in this context.

  • Crystalloids, such as normal saline, are commonly used for fluid resuscitation in hemorrhagic shock 2, 3, 4. However, high volumes of crystalloids can cause inflammation and may be detrimental to patients 2.
  • Bicarbonated Ringer's solution (BRS) has been shown to be effective in maintaining acid-base balance and protecting tissues and organs in hemorrhagic shock models 3.
  • Hypertonic solutions may be beneficial in patients with traumatic brain injury, as they can help reduce intracranial pressure and inflammation 4.
  • The use of blood products, such as packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets, is also recommended in the treatment of hemorrhagic shock 5.
  • Fresh whole blood may be a viable option for treating hemorrhagic shock in certain situations, such as on the battlefield 5.
  • Low-volume crystalloid replacement strategies may be preferable to high-volume strategies, as they can help minimize blood dilution and maintain coagulation parameters 6.

Key Considerations

When selecting a fluid for hemorrhagic shock, several factors should be considered, including:

  • The patient's underlying condition and any comorbidities
  • The severity of the hemorrhagic shock
  • The availability of different fluids and blood products
  • The potential risks and benefits of each fluid option 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Noncolligative properties of intravenous fluids.

Current opinion in critical care, 2010

Research

Fluid resuscitation in multiple trauma patients.

Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2011

Research

Tactical Damage Control Resuscitation.

Military medicine, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.