What is the effect of composite light cure with high intensity for 1 second?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Composite light cure with high intensity for 1 second is not recommended due to potential inadequate polymerization and reduced restoration longevity. The provided evidence does not directly address the effect of composite light cure with high intensity for 1 second, but it discusses the importance of proper light curing in dental restorations 1. Most composite materials require 10-20 seconds of light curing at high intensity (1000-1500 mW/cm²) to achieve adequate polymerization. While some manufacturers market "1-second cure" lights with extremely high intensities (3000+ mW/cm²), these typically don't allow sufficient time for optimal cross-linking of polymer chains, potentially resulting in inferior mechanical properties, increased shrinkage stress, and reduced restoration longevity.

  • Key factors to consider in light curing include:
    • Intensity: 1000-1500 mW/cm²
    • Curing time: 10-20 seconds per 2mm increment
    • Type of composite material: bulk-fill composites can be placed in 4-5mm increments with 10-20 second cure times
  • Inadequate curing can lead to increased wear, discoloration, secondary caries, and restoration failure, which can negatively impact patient outcomes, including morbidity, mortality, and quality of life 1.
  • It is essential to follow manufacturer's recommended curing times and use a high-quality LED curing light to ensure proper polymerization and optimal restoration longevity.

From the Research

Effect of Composite Light Cure with High Intensity for 1 Second

  • The effect of composite light cure with high intensity for 1 second is not directly addressed in the provided studies, as they investigate different curing times and intensities.
  • However, a study by 2 found that 3200 mW/cm(2) ×3 s light irradiation did not initiate light curing of the specimens, suggesting that a longer curing time may be necessary for effective polymerization.
  • Another study by 3 found that shortness light-curing may result in similar properties for new bulk-fill RBCs, but it does not specifically investigate a curing time of 1 second.
  • A study by 4 recommends routine exposure times of 60 seconds using light-source intensities of at least 400 mW/cm2, and suggests that incremental layer thickness should not exceed 2 mm.
  • It is worth noting that the effectiveness of cure and shrinkage can be material-dependent, as shown in a study by 5, which found that the effect of the curing method on the effectiveness of cure and shrinkage was material-dependent.

Material-Dependent Effects

  • The study by 5 found that polymerization of IT and TC with Spectrum for 40 seconds resulted in significantly more effective cure than polymerization with Astralis for 10 seconds.
  • The same study found that polymerization of ZO with Spectrum for 40 seconds resulted in significantly more shrinkage than polymerization with Astralis for 10 seconds.
  • The study by 6 found that the effectiveness of cure at the bottom surfaces of composites may be increased by soft-start and turbo polymerization regimens.

Curing Time and Intensity

  • The study by 2 found that 3200 mW/cm(2) light intensity should be used for irradiation at least for 6 s, which could initiate light curing of flowable composite core to sufficient polymerization.
  • The study by 4 found that sources with intensity values less than 233 mW/cm2 should not be used because of their poor cure characteristics.
  • The study by 3 suggests that new bulk-fill RBCs can be light-cured with a short exposure time and high intensity, providing a time-saving benefit in clinical practice.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.