Should a patient with Candida species and Candida glabrata vulvovaginitis stop taking an SGLT-2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitor for diabetes and what treatment is recommended for vulvovaginitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Candida glabrata Vulvovaginitis in a Diabetic Patient on SGLT-2 Inhibitor

The patient should temporarily discontinue the SGLT-2 inhibitor and be treated with topical intravaginal boric acid 600 mg daily for 14 days for Candida glabrata vulvovaginitis. 1

SGLT-2 Inhibitor Considerations

SGLT-2 inhibitors increase urinary glucose excretion, which creates an environment favorable for fungal growth. Research has demonstrated that:

  • Patients taking canagliflozin (an SGLT-2 inhibitor) have significantly higher rates of vaginal Candida colonization (31% vs 14% for placebo/sitagliptin) 2
  • SGLT-2 inhibitor use is associated with increased vulvovaginal adverse events (10% vs 3% for placebo/sitagliptin) 2
  • Patients with positive Candida cultures at baseline have 9.1 times higher risk of developing vulvovaginal adverse events when taking SGLT-2 inhibitors 2

Given these findings, temporarily discontinuing the SGLT-2 inhibitor is recommended while treating the vulvovaginitis. This medication can be reconsidered after successful treatment and clearance of the infection.

Treatment Algorithm for Candida glabrata Vulvovaginitis

First-line treatment:

  • Boric acid vaginal suppositories: 600 mg intravaginally daily for 14 days 1
    • This is the recommended treatment for C. glabrata vulvovaginitis that is unresponsive to oral azoles
    • Studies show significantly higher mycological cure rates with boric acid (72.4%) compared to fluconazole (33.3%) in diabetic women with C. glabrata infection 3

Alternative options (if boric acid is unavailable or not tolerated):

  1. Nystatin intravaginal suppositories: 100,000 units daily for 14 days 1
  2. Topical 17% flucytosine cream alone or with 3% AmB cream daily for 14 days 1

Important considerations:

  • Fluconazole and other oral azoles have poor efficacy against C. glabrata (only 28.6-33.3% cure rate) 3, 4
  • C. glabrata is the predominant species (39-54%) in diabetic women with vulvovaginal candidiasis 4, 5
  • Poor glycemic control increases risk of vulvovaginal candidiasis and treatment failure 6, 5

Follow-up and Prevention

  1. Glycemic control:

    • Optimize diabetes management with alternative medications while SGLT-2 inhibitor is discontinued
    • Consider HbA1c testing, as higher levels correlate with increased risk of vulvovaginal candidiasis 5
  2. Follow-up:

    • Return for evaluation if symptoms persist after completing treatment 1
    • Consider test-of-cure culture in diabetic patients with C. glabrata due to higher treatment failure rates
  3. Prevention:

    • Maintain optimal glycemic control
    • Consider prophylaxis if recurrent infections develop after SGLT-2 inhibitor is restarted

Special Considerations

  • If the patient absolutely requires the SGLT-2 inhibitor for glycemic control, consider maintenance antifungal therapy (fluconazole 150 mg weekly) after successful treatment 1
  • Treatment of sexual partners is generally not recommended unless they are symptomatic 1
  • C. glabrata infections are particularly challenging in diabetic patients and may require longer treatment courses or combination therapy

The combination of discontinuing the SGLT-2 inhibitor and using boric acid vaginal suppositories provides the best chance for complete resolution of C. glabrata vulvovaginitis in this diabetic patient.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.