What is the recurrence rate of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) after a stem cell transplant in a 64-year-old male?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recurrence Rate of AML After Stem Cell Transplant in a 64-Year-Old Male

The recurrence rate of AML after stem cell transplantation in a 64-year-old male ranges from 30-38%, with higher rates in those with FLT3 mutations (38%) compared to wild-type (28%). 1

Risk Factors for Relapse

Several factors influence the likelihood of AML recurrence after transplantation:

  • Time to transplant: Patients transplanted in first complete remission (CR1) have significantly lower relapse rates compared to those transplanted in CR2 or beyond 1
  • Genetic factors:
    • Presence of FLT3-ITD mutations increases relapse risk (38% vs 28% in wild-type) 1
    • NPM1 mutations are associated with better outcomes and lower relapse rates 1
    • Adverse cytogenetics significantly worsen prognosis 1
  • Pre-transplant disease status:
    • Minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity before transplant increases relapse risk 1
    • Need for more than one induction treatment to achieve remission negatively affects outcomes 1

Timing of Relapse

The timing of relapse is critical for prognosis:

  • Median time to relapse after transplantation is approximately 6.5 months 2
  • Early relapse (within 6 months) carries a particularly poor prognosis 2
  • FLT3-mutated AML is associated with higher risk of early relapse (30-59%) compared to FLT3-wildtype AML 1

Age Considerations

Despite the patient's age of 64, evidence suggests that age alone should not be considered a contraindication to transplant or affect post-transplant outcomes:

  • A study of patients ≥60 years showed that age did not adversely affect non-relapse mortality, relapse rate, relapse-free survival, or overall survival 3
  • The 1-year relapse rate in patients ≥60 years was 21.4% 3
  • Disease risk index was more predictive of outcomes than age 3

Post-Transplant Monitoring and Prevention

To improve outcomes, the following monitoring and prevention strategies are recommended:

  • Regular MRD monitoring using RT-qPCR or multiparameter flow cytometry to detect impending relapse 1
  • Chimerism studies to assess donor cell engraftment 4
  • Maintenance therapy considerations:
    • For patients with FLT3 mutations, post-transplant maintenance with sorafenib significantly reduced relapse incidence (HR=0.39) 1
    • Midostaurin maintenance showed promising results with estimated relapse rates at 18 months of 11% vs 24% in standard care 1

Management of Relapse

If relapse occurs despite preventive measures:

  • Prognosis is generally poor with median overall survival of 3-6 months 5, 2
  • Factors influencing survival after relapse include:
    • Time to relapse after transplant (longer is better) 5
    • Performance status at relapse 5
    • Disease burden (patients with <5% bone marrow blasts have better outcomes) 2
  • Treatment options include:
    • Intensive salvage chemotherapy (can achieve CR in up to 71% of selected patients) 5
    • Second cellular therapy (second transplant or donor lymphocyte infusion) 2
    • Clinical trials with novel agents 1

Summary of Relapse Rates

Based on the most recent and highest quality evidence:

  • Overall relapse rate after stem cell transplant: 30-38% 1
  • In FLT3-mutated AML: 38% 1
  • In FLT3-wildtype AML: 28% 1
  • In patients ≥60 years: 21.4% at 1 year 3

The patient's specific risk factors should be evaluated to determine if they fall into a higher or lower risk category within these ranges.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.