Management of Basilar Artery Aneurysms: Endovascular Treatment vs. Surgical Clipping
For patients with basilar artery aneurysms, endovascular coiling should be considered the first-line treatment due to lower morbidity and mortality rates compared to surgical clipping, especially for posterior circulation aneurysms. 1
Risk Assessment for Basilar Artery Aneurysms
Basilar artery aneurysms carry significant risks due to their location in the posterior circulation:
Natural History Risk Factors:
Treatment Risk Considerations:
Evidence Supporting Endovascular Treatment
A direct comparison of endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping for basilar tip aneurysms demonstrated:
- 11% poor outcome rate with endovascular treatment versus 30% with surgical clipping 2
- Adjusted odds ratio for poor outcome after coiling versus clipping was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.99) 2
- Procedural complications were more common in the surgical group 2
This aligns with AHA/ASA guidelines which state that for ruptured aneurysms judged to be technically amenable to both treatment modalities, endovascular coiling should be considered (Class I; Level of Evidence B) 1.
Treatment Algorithm for Basilar Artery Aneurysms
Initial Assessment:
- Evaluate aneurysm size, morphology, neck width, and relationship to perforators
- Assess patient factors: age, clinical condition, comorbidities
Primary Treatment Recommendation:
Specific Endovascular Approaches Based on Aneurysm Characteristics:
Consider Surgical Clipping When:
- Endovascular access is difficult or impossible
- Aneurysm morphology is unfavorable for coiling (very wide neck)
- Patient has mass effect symptoms requiring decompression 1
- Previous failed endovascular treatment
Follow-up and Monitoring
- Complete obliteration should be the goal of treatment (Class I; Level of Evidence B) 1
- All patients should have delayed follow-up vascular imaging after treatment 1
- Retreatment should be considered for clinically significant remnants 1
- Endovascular treatment may require more frequent follow-up due to higher recurrence rates
Important Caveats and Pitfalls
Incomplete Occlusion Risk:
- Endovascular coiling achieves complete occlusion in only 54% of aneurysms initially 1
- Incomplete occlusion increases risk of regrowth and rebleeding
- Follow-up angiography is essential to detect recurrence
Technical Challenges:
Institutional Expertise:
Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Risks:
- Use of stents requires antiplatelet therapy which carries bleeding risks, especially in cases of ruptured aneurysms 1
In conclusion, while both treatment modalities have their place, the evidence strongly supports endovascular coiling as the preferred initial approach for most basilar artery aneurysms, with surgical clipping reserved for specific situations where endovascular treatment is not feasible or optimal.