What is the next best step for a patient with urinary incontinence due to a scarred open urethra?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Urinary Incontinence with Scarred Open Urethra

For a patient with urinary incontinence due to a scarred open urethra, the next best step is surgical intervention with an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement, as this provides the best long-term quality of life outcomes.

Initial Assessment of Urethral Condition

When evaluating a patient with urinary incontinence related to a scarred open urethra, it's critical to understand that this anatomical defect represents a severe form of sphincteric insufficiency that typically won't respond to conservative measures. The scarred open urethra indicates structural damage that requires surgical correction.

Before proceeding with any intervention:

  • Evaluate the extent of urethral scarring through urethral evaluation
  • Review any previous operative reports if the scarring resulted from prior procedures
  • Assess the severity of incontinence (number of pads used, impact on quality of life)
  • Rule out other contributing factors such as bladder dysfunction

Treatment Algorithm Based on AUA Guidelines

Step 1: Confirm Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

  • Confirm that the incontinence is primarily stress-related through history and physical examination
  • A scarred open urethra typically results in stress urinary incontinence due to sphincteric insufficiency 1

Step 2: Surgical Management Options

According to the AUA/SUFU guidelines, for patients with severe incontinence or those with anatomical defects like a scarred open urethra:

  1. Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) - First-line surgical option

    • Provides the best long-term continence outcomes
    • Particularly indicated for patients with severe anatomical defects 1
    • Expected outcome: significant improvement in continence with potential for only one thin pad per day
  2. Male Sling Procedures - Secondary option

    • Less effective for patients with severe anatomical defects like scarred open urethra
    • Better suited for mild to moderate incontinence without significant urethral scarring 1

Step 3: Pre-Surgical Considerations

  • Treat any urethral strictures or bladder neck contractures first before addressing incontinence 1
  • This is critical as the AUA guidelines specifically state: "Patients with symptomatic vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis or bladder neck contracture should be treated prior to surgery for incontinence" 1

Rationale for AUS as First-Line Treatment

The artificial urinary sphincter is recommended as the first-line surgical option for several reasons:

  1. Superior efficacy for severe anatomical defects: A scarred open urethra represents significant structural damage that typically requires the mechanical closure provided by an AUS 1

  2. Long-term outcomes: AUS provides better long-term continence rates for patients with severe sphincteric insufficiency

  3. Adaptability: The pressure of the AUS can be adjusted based on the degree of urethral scarring and damage

  4. Quality of life impact: Despite being more invasive than other options, AUS offers the best chance for significant improvement in quality of life by addressing the fundamental anatomical problem 1

Important Considerations and Potential Pitfalls

  • Infection risk: There is a risk of device infection with AUS placement. Proper perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is essential.

  • Mechanical failure: Patients should be counseled about the possibility of device malfunction requiring revision surgery.

  • Urethral atrophy: Over time, pressure from the AUS cuff may cause urethral atrophy, potentially requiring cuff downsizing or repositioning.

  • Alternative if AUS fails: If multiple AUS placements fail, urinary diversion may be considered as a last resort for patients who cannot achieve satisfactory quality of life with other interventions 1

Conclusion

For patients with urinary incontinence due to a scarred open urethra, the anatomical defect requires a surgical approach. The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is the most appropriate next step as it directly addresses the sphincteric insufficiency caused by the scarred urethra and offers the best chance for improved quality of life with minimal pad usage.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.