What is the best method for recalling laboratory values?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The most effective method for recalling laboratory values is to collect and record the minimum suggested data, including value, unit of measurement, date, and normal range, as outlined in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force report 1. When recalling laboratory values, it is essential to prioritize the most critical information, such as:

  • Value
  • Unit of measurement
  • Date
  • Normal range (upper limit of normal when appropriate) This approach ensures that healthcare professionals can quickly and accurately recall vital laboratory information, which is crucial for making informed clinical decisions. To further enhance recall, it is recommended to:
  • Record serial values for outpatient care, including dates to reflect first, highest, and lowest values
  • Record at least the first value obtained closest to admission for inpatient care assessment
  • Focus on key laboratory tests, such as:
  • Electrolytes (sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium)
  • Thyroid function (TSH)
  • Complete blood count (CBC)
  • Renal function (blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine)
  • Lipid profile (total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides) By following this structured approach, healthcare professionals can improve their ability to recall laboratory values accurately and efficiently, ultimately enhancing patient care and outcomes, as suggested by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force report 1.

From the Research

Methods for Recalling Laboratory Values

There are various methods for recalling laboratory values, including:

  • Closed-loop laboratory critical value notification systems, which have been shown to improve the timely notification of critical laboratory values 2
  • Point-of-care testing devices, such as blood gas analyzers, which can provide rapid results for electrolytes and hemoglobin, but may have differences in results compared to central laboratory measurements 3
  • Predictive modeling approaches, such as zero order Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy modeling, which can be used to predict laboratory values, such as Calcium and Hematocrit, for patients with specific conditions, like gastrointestinal bleeding 4

Factors Affecting Laboratory Values

Several factors can affect laboratory values, including:

  • Comorbidities, which can impact the accuracy of predictive models for laboratory values 4
  • Medications, which can influence laboratory results, such as liver function markers in HIV patients 5
  • Patient characteristics, such as age, gender, and CD4 lymphocyte levels, which can be associated with alterations in laboratory values, like liver function markers in HIV patients 5

Best Practices for Recalling Laboratory Values

Best practices for recalling laboratory values include:

  • Implementing closed-loop notification systems to ensure timely and accurate notification of critical laboratory values 2
  • Using point-of-care testing devices in conjunction with central laboratory measurements to verify results 3
  • Considering patient-specific factors, such as comorbidities and medications, when interpreting laboratory results 4, 5

Related Questions

What is the best course of action for a 45-year-old female with uncontrolled hypertension, presenting with intermittent paresthesia, and no primary care physician (PCP)?
What are the health concerns for a 78-year-old male?
Does an 84-year-old male patient with a history of fall, presenting with dizziness and rib pain, require laboratory tests after undergoing non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans?
What is considered a normal finding in a 36-year-old gravida 2 para 1 (G2P1) woman at 9 weeks gestation with a history of preeclampsia without severe features, normal blood pressure (120/70 mm Hg is equivalent to normotension), and normal body mass index (BMI of 23 kg/m2 is equivalent to normal weight), and with a pelvic ultrasound showing an intrauterine pregnancy with a normal fetal heart rate?
Should a 38-year-old male with chronic back pain and multiple compression fractures at T12, L1, and possibly L2, without significant trauma history, and with a height of 6 feet 4 inches (193 centimeters), undergo blood testing for workup?
Does a Complete Blood Count (CBC) include a bilirubin level?
Does a Complete Blood Count (CBC) with differential include a bilirubin level?
What medications are associated with hyperammonemia (elevated ammonia levels)?
When should an individual receive the influenza (flu) vaccine?
Can Dravet syndrome (Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infancy) present with normal developmental milestones initially?
What are the diagnostic criteria for Dravet (Epilepsy, Severe Myoclonic) syndrome?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.