Is instrumentation at the fracture level stronger in burst fractures?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Instrumentation at the Fracture Level for Burst Fractures

Instrumentation at the fracture level provides significantly greater biomechanical stability in burst fractures compared to traditional short-segment fixation without fracture-level screws. 1, 2, 3

Biomechanical Advantages of Fracture-Level Instrumentation

Fracture-level screw placement offers several key advantages:

  • Enhanced construct stiffness: Adding screws at the fracture level improves overall construct stability by approximately 68% compared to conventional short-segment posterior fixation 3
  • Better kyphosis correction: Fracture-level screws provide superior intraoperative correction and maintenance of sagittal alignment 1, 2
  • Improved height restoration: Studies show significantly better compression ratio of anterior vertebral height when fracture-level screws are incorporated 2
  • Comparable to longer constructs: Fracture-level screw reinforcement provides stability comparable to long-segment fixation but preserves more motion segments 3

Clinical Outcomes with Fracture-Level Instrumentation

Research demonstrates significant clinical benefits:

  • Better radiographic parameters: Statistically significant improvements in sagittal index (p<0.001), local kyphosis angle (p=0.006), and compression ratio of anterior vertebral height (p=0.002) when fracture-level screws are used 2
  • Maintained correction: Fracture-level screws help maintain the correction achieved intraoperatively over time, which is particularly important in short-segment constructs 1
  • Reduced hardware failure: The additional point of fixation decreases stress on adjacent-level screws, potentially reducing hardware failure rates

Practical Application

For thoracolumbar burst fractures:

  1. Short-segment fixation with fracture-level screws is preferable to traditional short-segment fixation (one level above and below without fracture-level screws)
  2. Consider fracture severity:
    • Stable burst fractures: Short-segment with fracture-level screws may be sufficient
    • Unstable burst fractures: Fracture-level screws can make short-segment constructs viable, potentially avoiding the need for long-segment fixation

Important Considerations and Caveats

  • Pedicle integrity: Ensure the pedicles at the fracture level are intact enough to accept screws
  • Vertebral body comminution: Extreme comminution may limit the effectiveness of fracture-level screws
  • Alternative augmentation: For severely unstable fractures, consider additional anterior column support through vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty 4 or anterior approaches
  • Rehabilitation concerns: Overly aggressive physical therapy should be avoided in the early postoperative period to prevent fixation failure 5

Fracture-level screw placement represents a valuable technical advancement in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures, offering improved biomechanical stability while preserving motion segments compared to traditional long-segment constructs.

References

Research

Percutaneous augmented instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2012

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.