What is the treatment for a non-displaced distal fibula Salter Harris type 2 fracture?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Non-Displaced Distal Fibula Salter Harris Type 2 Fracture

Non-displaced distal fibula Salter-Harris type 2 fractures should be treated with cast immobilization without the need for reduction, as these fractures have excellent outcomes with conservative management. 1

Initial Management

  • For non-displaced fractures (displacement <3mm):
    • Apply a short leg cast
    • No reduction is necessary
    • Weight-bearing status should be non-weight bearing initially

Cast Selection and Duration

  • Short leg cast is sufficient and offers advantages over long leg cast:
    • Similar rates of loss of reduction (no statistically significant difference in displacement rates) 2
    • Shorter total casting time (statistically significant) 2
    • Quicker return to activities 2
    • Better functional outcomes during recovery

Follow-up Protocol

  • Radiographic follow-up at:
    • 1-2 weeks after initial casting to ensure no displacement has occurred
    • 3-4 weeks for assessment of healing
    • Final follow-up at cast removal (typically 4-6 weeks total)

Monitoring for Complications

  • Monitor for premature physeal closure (PPC), which is the most common complication:
    • Overall complication rate for non-displaced fractures is very low (approximately 2%) 1
    • If clinical concern for growth disturbance develops (angular deformity, limb length discrepancy), obtain CT imaging to assess for bony bar formation

When to Consider Surgical Management

  • Surgery is indicated only if:
    • Displacement is ≥3mm 1, 3
    • Closed reduction fails to achieve <2mm displacement 4
    • Loss of reduction occurs during follow-up

Key Considerations and Pitfalls

  1. Avoid unnecessary reduction attempts for truly non-displaced fractures, as manipulation of the physis can increase risk of growth disturbance

  2. Differentiate from distal tibia fractures, which have higher complication rates:

    • Distal tibia SH-II fractures have much higher rates of premature physeal closure (29-55%) 4, 3
    • Fibula fractures generally have better prognosis than similar fractures of the distal tibia
  3. Recognize risk factors for complications:

    • Displacement >3mm
    • Multiple reduction attempts
    • Delayed treatment
    • High-energy mechanism of injury
  4. Ensure adequate follow-up for at least 4-6 months to monitor for any growth disturbances, even though these are rare in non-displaced fibular fractures

The excellent prognosis of non-displaced distal fibula Salter-Harris type 2 fractures supports a conservative approach with cast immobilization as the definitive treatment, with surgical intervention reserved only for significantly displaced fractures.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.