What are the treatment options for rectal prolapse?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Options for Rectal Prolapse

For rectal prolapse treatment, a stepwise approach based on the severity and patient characteristics is recommended, with conservative measures attempted first for uncomplicated cases and surgical intervention for complicated or refractory cases. 1

Initial Assessment and Classification

  • Complete blood count, serum creatinine, and inflammatory markers (CRP, procalcitonin, lactates) should be checked to assess patient status 1
  • In stable patients with irreducible or strangulated prolapse, contrast-enhanced abdomino-pelvic CT scan is recommended to detect complications and assess for colorectal cancer 1
  • Colonoscopy is important as rectal prolapse carries a 4.2-fold increased risk of colorectal cancer 1

Non-Operative Management (For Uncomplicated Cases)

For incarcerated rectal prolapse without signs of ischemia or perforation:

  • Conservative measures with gentle manual reduction under mild sedation or anesthesia should be attempted first 1

  • Techniques to reduce edema before manual reduction:

    • Topical application of granulated sugar or hypertonic sugar solutions (creates hyperosmolar environment to draw out fluid)
    • Submucosal adrenaline injections
    • Submucosal hyaluronidase infiltration
    • Elastic compression wrap
  • Patient should be placed in Trendelenburg position with appropriate analgesia/sedation 1

Surgical Management

Indications for Immediate Surgery:

  • Signs of shock or gangrene/perforation of prolapsed bowel 1
  • Hemodynamic instability 1
  • Failed conservative management 1
  • Bleeding or acute bowel obstruction 1

Surgical Approach Selection:

  1. For hemodynamically unstable patients or those with peritonitis:

    • Abdominal open approach is strongly recommended 1
  2. For stable patients without peritonitis:

    • Choice between abdominal and perineal procedures should be based on patient characteristics and surgeon expertise 1
  3. Specific approach considerations:

    • Abdominal procedures (lower recurrence rates, 0-8%):

      • Recommended for younger, healthier patients 1, 2
      • Options include resection rectopexy, suture rectopexy, or mesh rectopexy
      • Can be performed open or laparoscopically in stable patients
      • Adding bowel resection reduces post-operative constipation but should be avoided in patients with pre-existing diarrhea/incontinence 1
    • Perineal procedures (higher recurrence rates, 5-21%):

      • Better suited for elderly patients with significant comorbidities 1, 2
      • Options include perineal proctosigmoidectomy (Altemeier procedure) and Delorme procedure (mucosal resection)
      • Lower perioperative morbidity but higher recurrence rate 1
      • May be combined with levatoroplasty to reduce recurrence risk 1

Special Considerations

  • Asymptomatic Grade 1-2 rectal prolapse does not require surgery and should be managed conservatively 1
  • Symptomatic grade 3-4 prolapse requires surgical intervention 1
  • For patients with constipation and rectal prolapse, resection rectopexy may provide better functional outcomes 1, 2
  • For patients with incontinence, avoid bowel resection as it may worsen symptoms 1
  • In patients requiring resectional surgery, the decision between primary anastomosis (with/without diverting ostomy) and terminal colostomy should be based on patient condition and risk of anastomotic leakage 1
  • Empiric antimicrobial therapy is recommended for strangulated rectal prolapse due to risk of bacterial translocation 1

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Delaying surgical management in hemodynamically unstable patients to attempt conservative measures 1
  • Performing bowel resection in patients with pre-existing diarrhea or incontinence 1
  • Overlooking colorectal cancer screening in patients with rectal prolapse 1
  • Performing STARR procedure without careful patient selection (can lead to complications including infection, pain, incontinence, bleeding, fistula, peritonitis, and bowel perforation) 1
  • Treating only the anatomical abnormality without addressing underlying functional disorders 1

By following this structured approach to rectal prolapse management, clinicians can optimize outcomes while minimizing morbidity and mortality.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Surgical management of rectal prolapse.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960), 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.