Treatment Options for Rectal Prolapse
For rectal prolapse treatment, a stepwise approach based on the severity and patient characteristics is recommended, with conservative measures attempted first for uncomplicated cases and surgical intervention for complicated or refractory cases. 1
Initial Assessment and Classification
- Complete blood count, serum creatinine, and inflammatory markers (CRP, procalcitonin, lactates) should be checked to assess patient status 1
- In stable patients with irreducible or strangulated prolapse, contrast-enhanced abdomino-pelvic CT scan is recommended to detect complications and assess for colorectal cancer 1
- Colonoscopy is important as rectal prolapse carries a 4.2-fold increased risk of colorectal cancer 1
Non-Operative Management (For Uncomplicated Cases)
For incarcerated rectal prolapse without signs of ischemia or perforation:
Conservative measures with gentle manual reduction under mild sedation or anesthesia should be attempted first 1
Techniques to reduce edema before manual reduction:
- Topical application of granulated sugar or hypertonic sugar solutions (creates hyperosmolar environment to draw out fluid)
- Submucosal adrenaline injections
- Submucosal hyaluronidase infiltration
- Elastic compression wrap
Patient should be placed in Trendelenburg position with appropriate analgesia/sedation 1
Surgical Management
Indications for Immediate Surgery:
- Signs of shock or gangrene/perforation of prolapsed bowel 1
- Hemodynamic instability 1
- Failed conservative management 1
- Bleeding or acute bowel obstruction 1
Surgical Approach Selection:
For hemodynamically unstable patients or those with peritonitis:
- Abdominal open approach is strongly recommended 1
For stable patients without peritonitis:
- Choice between abdominal and perineal procedures should be based on patient characteristics and surgeon expertise 1
Specific approach considerations:
Abdominal procedures (lower recurrence rates, 0-8%):
- Recommended for younger, healthier patients 1, 2
- Options include resection rectopexy, suture rectopexy, or mesh rectopexy
- Can be performed open or laparoscopically in stable patients
- Adding bowel resection reduces post-operative constipation but should be avoided in patients with pre-existing diarrhea/incontinence 1
Perineal procedures (higher recurrence rates, 5-21%):
Special Considerations
- Asymptomatic Grade 1-2 rectal prolapse does not require surgery and should be managed conservatively 1
- Symptomatic grade 3-4 prolapse requires surgical intervention 1
- For patients with constipation and rectal prolapse, resection rectopexy may provide better functional outcomes 1, 2
- For patients with incontinence, avoid bowel resection as it may worsen symptoms 1
- In patients requiring resectional surgery, the decision between primary anastomosis (with/without diverting ostomy) and terminal colostomy should be based on patient condition and risk of anastomotic leakage 1
- Empiric antimicrobial therapy is recommended for strangulated rectal prolapse due to risk of bacterial translocation 1
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Delaying surgical management in hemodynamically unstable patients to attempt conservative measures 1
- Performing bowel resection in patients with pre-existing diarrhea or incontinence 1
- Overlooking colorectal cancer screening in patients with rectal prolapse 1
- Performing STARR procedure without careful patient selection (can lead to complications including infection, pain, incontinence, bleeding, fistula, peritonitis, and bowel perforation) 1
- Treating only the anatomical abnormality without addressing underlying functional disorders 1
By following this structured approach to rectal prolapse management, clinicians can optimize outcomes while minimizing morbidity and mortality.