Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Using the PALM-COEIN Classification System
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) should be systematically evaluated and managed using the PALM-COEIN classification system, which provides a structured approach to identify both structural and non-structural causes and guide appropriate treatment. 1
Initial Assessment
History
- Bleeding pattern characterization:
- Frequency (frequent, normal, infrequent)
- Regularity (regular, irregular)
- Duration (prolonged, normal, shortened)
- Volume (heavy, normal, light)
- Associated symptoms (pain, dyspareunia, pressure)
- Risk factors for endometrial cancer:
- Age >45 years
- Obesity
- Diabetes
- Hypertension
- PCOS
- Family history of endometrial/colon/breast cancer
- Tamoxifen use
- Unopposed estrogen exposure
Physical Examination
- Vital signs (assess for hemodynamic instability)
- BMI calculation
- Pelvic examination to identify:
- Vaginal/cervical lesions
- Uterine size/contour
- Adnexal masses
- Signs of hyperandrogenism
Laboratory Evaluation
- Pregnancy test (β-hCG)
- Complete blood count
- TSH and prolactin levels
- Coagulation studies if heavy bleeding or suspicion of coagulopathy
- Consider hormonal profile if PCOS or ovulatory dysfunction suspected
Diagnostic Workup Based on PALM-COEIN
Imaging
Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS): First-line imaging for all patients with AUB 1
- Evaluates endometrial thickness
- Identifies structural abnormalities (polyps, fibroids, adenomyosis)
- Limitations: body habitus, uterine position, presence of leiomyomas
Saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS):
- High sensitivity (96-100%) for intracavitary lesions 1
- Indicated when TVUS is inconclusive or intracavitary lesions suspected
MRI:
- When TVUS is inconclusive
- Better visualization of adenomyosis
- Differentiation between leiomyomas and adenomyosis
- Add diffusion-weighted imaging to improve sensitivity 1
Tissue Sampling
Endometrial biopsy:
- Indicated for all women >45 years with AUB
- Women <45 years with risk factors for endometrial cancer
- Preferred over D&C (less invasive, safer, lower cost) 1
Hysteroscopy:
- Direct visualization of endometrial cavity
- Diagnosis of focal lesions possibly missed by endometrial sampling
- Allows for directed biopsies and treatment of polyps/submucosal fibroids
Management Algorithm Based on PALM-COEIN Classification
Structural Causes (PALM)
Polyps (P)
- Hysteroscopic polypectomy
- Follow-up to ensure resolution of symptoms
Adenomyosis (A)
- Medical management:
- LNG-IUD (88.7% effective in reducing bleeding) 2
- Combined hormonal contraceptives
- NSAIDs for pain
- Surgical options if medical management fails:
- Endometrial ablation (if no future fertility desired)
- Hysterectomy (definitive treatment)
Leiomyoma (L)
- Medical management:
- LNG-IUD (less effective at 55.6% compared to other causes) 2
- Tranexamic acid
- NSAIDs
- GnRH agonists (short-term use)
- Surgical options:
- Hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids
- Abdominal/laparoscopic myomectomy for intramural/subserosal fibroids
- Uterine artery embolization
- Hysterectomy (definitive treatment)
Malignancy and Hyperplasia (M)
- Endometrial hyperplasia without atypia:
- LNG-IUD (95.5% effective) 2
- Cyclic progestins
- Atypical hyperplasia or malignancy:
- Referral to gynecologic oncology
- Hysterectomy typically required
Non-Structural Causes (COEIN)
Coagulopathy (C)
- Tranexamic acid
- Hormonal therapy (COCs, LNG-IUD)
- Hematology referral if severe
- DDAVP for von Willebrand disease
Ovulatory Dysfunction (O)
- Combined hormonal contraceptives (first-line)
- Progestin-only options (oral, injectable, LNG-IUD)
- Address underlying causes (PCOS, thyroid disease, hyperprolactinemia)
- Weight management if obesity-related
Endometrial (E)
- NSAIDs
- Tranexamic acid
- Hormonal options (COCs, LNG-IUD)
- Endometrial ablation if medical management fails
Iatrogenic (I)
- Modify/discontinue causative medications if possible
- Hormonal treatments to counteract medication effects
- Consider alternative contraceptive methods if IUD-related
Not Yet Classified (N)
- LNG-IUD (92.3% effective) 2
- Symptomatic management based on bleeding pattern
- Re-evaluate diagnosis if treatment fails
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
Incomplete evaluation: Only 16.7% of AUB cases are diagnosed according to complete PALM-COEIN criteria 3. Ensure systematic evaluation of all potential causes.
Missing endometrial cancer: Always perform endometrial biopsy in women >45 years or those with risk factors regardless of imaging findings.
Inadequate imaging: TVUS may miss focal lesions; consider SIS or hysteroscopy when clinical suspicion remains despite normal TVUS.
Treatment selection: LNG-IUD effectiveness varies by underlying pathology (less effective for leiomyomas at 55.6% vs. 88-95% for other causes) 2.
Overlooking non-structural causes: Laboratory evaluation for coagulopathies, thyroid dysfunction, and ovulatory disorders is essential even when structural abnormalities are identified.
Failure to address quality of life: Consider impact of bleeding on anemia, fatigue, and daily activities when determining treatment urgency and aggressiveness.