Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam Synergistic Action in Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Infections
Ceftazidime-avibactam combined with aztreonam is strongly recommended as the preferred treatment for infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), showing significantly reduced mortality and clinical failure rates compared to other antimicrobial regimens. 1
Mechanism of Synergistic Action
The synergistic action between ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and aztreonam (AZT) works through complementary mechanisms:
- Aztreonam is stable against metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) but can be hydrolyzed by serine β-lactamases
- Avibactam inhibits serine β-lactamases (including ESBLs, AmpC, and KPC enzymes)
- When combined, aztreonam is protected from hydrolysis by serine β-lactamases due to avibactam, while maintaining its activity against MBL-producing organisms 1, 2
Clinical Evidence for Efficacy
The strongest evidence comes from a prospective study of patients with bloodstream infections caused by MBL-producing CRE:
- 30-day mortality: 19.2% with CAZ-AVI+AZT vs. 44% with other active antimicrobial agents (p=0.007)
- CAZ-AVI+AZT was associated with:
- Lower 30-day mortality (HR: 0.37,95% CI 0.13-0.74)
- Lower clinical treatment failure (HR: 0.30,95% CI 0.14-0.65)
- Shorter hospital stay (HR: 0.49,95% CI -0.82) 1
Another study of 57 CRE infections (71.9% critical cases) showed:
- 77.5% cure rate in patients with NDM or NDM+OXA-48-positive CRE treated with CAZ-AVI+AZT 1
Treatment Algorithm for MDR Gram-Negative Infections
Identify the carbapenemase type before initiating treatment whenever possible 1
- This is crucial for selecting the appropriate therapy
For MBL-producing organisms (NDM, VIM, IMP):
For serine carbapenemase producers only (KPC, OXA-48):
- CAZ-AVI alone may be sufficient (82.3% cure rate) 1
For organisms with multiple β-lactamase types:
Microbiological Considerations
In vitro studies demonstrate excellent synergy between CAZ-AVI and AZT against:
The combination is effective against both:
- MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (primary target)
- Some MBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa, though with less consistent results 5
Important Clinical Considerations and Pitfalls
Susceptibility testing challenges:
- No standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods or clinical interpretative breakpoints are currently approved for the CAZ-AVI+AZT combination 1
- Consider using specialized testing methods to confirm synergy
Resistance development:
- Monitor for potential resistance development during therapy
- Studies with CAZ-AVI alone have shown resistance rates of 3.8-10.4% 1
Dosing considerations:
- Prolonged infusion (3 hours) of CAZ-AVI and appropriate renal adjustment are associated with improved 30-day survival 1
- Ensure proper dosing of both agents
Patient selection:
- The combination is particularly valuable for critically ill patients with limited treatment options
- Most evidence is from patients with bloodstream infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections
This combination represents one of the few effective options for treating infections caused by MBL-producing organisms, which are often extremely drug-resistant and associated with high mortality rates.