Tetanus Prophylaxis for a 101-Year-Old with a Forearm Cut
The 101-year-old patient who cut her forearm on a bus door and last received a tetanus vaccine 20 years ago should receive both Td (tetanus and diphtheria toxoid) vaccine and Tetanus Immune Globulin (TIG) as part of wound management.
Assessment of Risk Factors
When evaluating the need for tetanus prophylaxis in this elderly patient, several key factors must be considered:
- Vaccination history: Last tetanus vaccine was 20 years ago (exceeds the 10-year booster interval)
- Age: Advanced age (101 years) may be associated with waning immunity
- Wound characteristics: Cut from a bus door (potentially contaminated)
Recommended Prophylaxis Algorithm
Step 1: Evaluate wound type
- This forearm cut from a bus door should be considered a potentially contaminated wound
- Bus doors are public surfaces that can harbor dirt and contaminants
- According to the CDC guidelines, this would qualify as "all other wounds" category rather than "clean, minor wounds" 1
Step 2: Assess vaccination status
- Patient received last tetanus vaccine 20 years ago (exceeds the recommended 10-year interval)
- For contaminated wounds, a tetanus toxoid-containing vaccine is indicated if >5 years since last dose 1
Step 3: Determine appropriate prophylaxis
- Based on the 2018 ACIP guidelines, this patient requires:
- Tetanus toxoid-containing vaccine (Td preferred in this age group)
- Tetanus Immune Globulin (TIG) administration
Evidence-Based Rationale
The 2018 ACIP guidelines clearly state that for wound management in persons with ≥3 previous tetanus toxoid doses who received their last dose >5 years ago and have a contaminated wound, a tetanus toxoid-containing vaccine should be administered 1. The table in these guidelines specifically indicates that for "all other wounds" (contaminated wounds), if it has been ≥5 years since the last tetanus toxoid-containing vaccine dose, a booster is indicated.
Additionally, while the patient likely completed a primary series in her lifetime, her advanced age (101 years) and the long interval since her last vaccination (20 years) warrant consideration of TIG administration for immediate passive protection, especially given the potentially contaminated nature of the wound 1.
Important Considerations
- Age-specific concerns: At 101 years old, immune senescence may reduce vaccine response, making passive immunization with TIG particularly important
- Administration technique: When both TIG and tetanus toxoid-containing vaccine are indicated, they should be administered using separate syringes at different anatomical sites 1
- Contraindications: Before administration, assess for history of severe allergic reactions to previous tetanus toxoid-containing vaccines or Arthus reactions 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Assuming immunity based on age alone: Even if the patient likely received a primary series decades ago, protection wanes over time, especially in the elderly
- Overlooking the need for TIG: In elderly patients with potentially contaminated wounds and remote vaccination, TIG provides immediate protection while the vaccine takes effect
- Using Tdap instead of Td in this age group: While Tdap is preferred for persons aged ≥11 years who have not previously received Tdap, for this 101-year-old patient, Td is more appropriate due to age considerations 1
This approach prioritizes protection against tetanus, which can have significant morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly patients, while following evidence-based guidelines for wound management.