What are the criteria for ordering a computed tomography (CT) head scan in pediatric patients?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CT Head Criteria for Pediatric Patients

CT head scans in pediatric patients should be ordered based on validated clinical decision rules such as the PECARN criteria, which stratify children into risk categories based on specific clinical findings rather than routine imaging for all head trauma cases.

PECARN Criteria for Pediatric Head CT

The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) criteria provide the most widely validated framework for determining the need for head CT in pediatric trauma patients 1. These criteria divide children into two age groups with specific risk factors:

For Children <2 Years Old

High risk (CT recommended - ~4.4% risk of clinically significant injury):

  • GCS score of 14 or other signs of altered mental status
  • Palpable skull fracture

Intermediate risk (Observation vs. CT based on other factors):

  • Occipital/parietal/temporal scalp hematoma
  • Loss of consciousness ≥5 seconds
  • Severe mechanism of injury
  • Not acting normally per parent
  • Consider CT if multiple factors present, worsening symptoms during observation, or parental preference

Very low risk (CT generally not necessary):

  • None of the above risk factors present

For Children ≥2 Years Old

High risk (CT recommended - ~4.3% risk of clinically significant injury):

  • GCS score of 14 or other signs of altered mental status
  • Signs of basilar skull fracture

Intermediate risk (Observation vs. CT based on other factors):

  • History of loss of consciousness
  • History of vomiting
  • Severe mechanism of injury
  • Severe headache
  • Consider CT if multiple factors present, worsening symptoms during observation, or parental preference

Very low risk (CT generally not necessary):

  • None of the above risk factors present

Special Considerations

Suspected Non-Accidental Trauma

  • Different criteria apply - refer to ACR Appropriateness Criteria on "Suspected Physical Abuse-Child" 1

Coagulopathy

  • Most clinical practice guidelines recommend CT in all pediatric patients with head trauma and coagulopathy, including medication-induced coagulopathy 1

Imaging Modality Selection

  • Non-contrast CT is the first-line imaging modality for acute pediatric head trauma due to its rapid acquisition time and excellent sensitivity for acute hemorrhage and fractures 1
  • MRI has higher sensitivity for small bleeds and non-hemorrhagic injuries but is impractical in emergency settings due to longer acquisition time and frequent need for sedation in young children 1
  • Skull radiographs are not sufficient for evaluation of traumatic brain injury as up to 50% of intracranial injuries occur without fracture 1

Radiation Concerns

  • Dedicated pediatric head CT parameters with protocols tailored to patient size should always be used to minimize radiation exposure 1
  • Multiplanar and 3D-reconstructed CT images increase sensitivity for fractures and small hemorrhages 1

Follow-up Imaging

  • Routine repeat head CT within 24-36 hours in pediatric patients with moderate to severe head trauma is unlikely to yield changes in therapy unless there is clinical deterioration or changes in intracranial pressure 2
  • For patients with epidural hemorrhage >10 cc or severe head trauma (GCS 3-8), repeat head CT may be warranted even without clinical deterioration 3

Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Over-imaging children with very low risk of clinically significant injury
  2. Under-imaging high-risk patients, particularly those with altered mental status
  3. Failing to recognize signs of non-accidental trauma that require different evaluation approaches
  4. Using adult head trauma criteria for pediatric patients
  5. Not using age-appropriate CT protocols that minimize radiation exposure

By following these evidence-based criteria, clinicians can appropriately identify pediatric patients who would benefit from head CT while avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure in those at very low risk for clinically significant traumatic brain injury.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.