Diagnosing Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE)
Currently, chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) can only be definitively diagnosed through postmortem neuropathological examination of brain tissue. 1
Clinical Context and Challenges
CTE is a neurodegenerative tauopathy associated with repetitive head trauma, including both concussive and subconcussive injuries. The condition was first recognized in boxers as "dementia pugilistica" but has now been identified in various contact sport athletes and military veterans exposed to blast injuries 2.
Key challenges in diagnosis include:
- No consensus-based clinical diagnostic criteria exist for living patients
- Clinical presentation overlaps with other neurodegenerative disorders
- Pathological changes develop progressively over years or decades
Clinical Presentation and Suspicion
When CTE is suspected based on history of repetitive head trauma, clinicians should evaluate for:
- Cognitive changes: Memory problems and executive dysfunction, potentially progressing to dementia 3
- Mood disturbances: Depression, apathy, and suicidality 3
- Personality/behavioral changes: Poor impulse control, behavioral disinhibition 3
- Movement disorders: Parkinsonism and possible signs of motor neuron disease 3
Diagnostic Approach
1. Neuroimaging
MRI of the brain is the most useful initial imaging for evaluation of suspected CTE 1
- More sensitive than CT for detecting subtle findings adjacent to the calvarium or skull base
- Can identify focal encephalomalacia at inferior frontal or anterior temporal lobes
- Superior for detecting small white matter lesions (microbleeds) from previous traumatic axonal injury
Advanced MRI techniques (research stage):
2. Exclusion of Other Conditions
- Rule out other neurodegenerative conditions that may present similarly:
- Alzheimer's disease
- Frontotemporal dementia
- Parkinson's disease
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 5
3. Emerging Biomarkers (Research Stage)
While not yet validated for clinical use, research is exploring:
- PET imaging: May detect tau protein deposition 1, 4
- Fluid biomarkers: Studies investigating t-tau, NFL, GFAP, CCL11, and sTREM2 4
Important Caveats and Pitfalls
- Avoid premature diagnosis: Without definitive biomarkers, CTE remains a postmortem diagnosis
- Consider comorbid conditions: Psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, and other neurological conditions may coexist or mimic CTE symptoms
- Recognize limitations of current research: Most clinical data comes from retrospective studies of severe cases
- Beware of overattribution: Not all cognitive or behavioral symptoms in individuals with history of head trauma are due to CTE
Management Implications
While definitive diagnosis remains elusive in living patients, identifying those with probable CTE has important implications:
- Guides symptomatic treatment of cognitive, behavioral, and motor symptoms
- Informs risk counseling regarding continued exposure to head impacts
- Provides context for family education and support planning
Future Directions
Research priorities include:
- Development of reliable in vivo biomarkers
- Establishment of consensus clinical diagnostic criteria
- Longitudinal studies correlating clinical features with pathological findings
Until definitive diagnostic criteria are established, the clinical assessment should be informed by current research in traumatic brain injury and neurodegenerative disease 3.