What is the risk of prostate cancer with dutasteride (Avodart)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risk of Cancer with Dutasteride (Avodart)

Dutasteride is associated with a decreased overall risk of prostate cancer detection but may increase the risk of high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason 8-10). This complex relationship requires careful consideration when prescribing dutasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Overall Cancer Risk Reduction

Dutasteride demonstrates a significant reduction in overall prostate cancer detection:

  • The REDUCE trial showed a 23% relative risk reduction in overall prostate cancer diagnosis compared to placebo 1
  • The CombAT trial demonstrated a 40% relative risk reduction in prostate cancer diagnosis with dutasteride (alone or with tamsulosin) compared to tamsulosin monotherapy 2
  • Meta-analysis confirms lower overall detectable prostate cancer in men taking dutasteride (MHRR: 0.66,95% CI 0.52-0.85) 3

High-Grade Cancer Risk

Despite reducing overall cancer detection, dutasteride has been associated with an increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer:

  • The REDUCE trial found more high-grade tumors in the dutasteride arm 1
  • During years 3-4 of the REDUCE study, there were 12 tumors with Gleason score 8-10 in the dutasteride group versus only 1 in the placebo group (p=0.003) 4
  • The FDA has not approved dutasteride for prostate cancer prevention, citing "an absolute increase in the incidence of high-grade prostate cancer" 1, 5

Interpreting the Evidence

The apparent paradox of decreased overall cancer but increased high-grade cancer may be explained by:

  1. Detection bias: Dutasteride reduces prostate volume and enhances PSA specificity, potentially improving detection of high-grade cancers that might otherwise be missed 1

  2. No mortality difference: Despite the increased detection of high-grade cancers, long-term follow-up has shown no significant difference in overall survival or prostate cancer-specific mortality 1

Clinical Implications for PSA Monitoring

For patients taking dutasteride:

  • Expect approximately 50% decrease in PSA levels within 6-12 months of starting therapy 1
  • This effect is highly variable - only about 35% of men show the expected 40-60% decrease 1
  • Failure to achieve significant PSA decrease while on dutasteride may indicate increased risk for prostate cancer 1
  • The common practice of doubling PSA values for cancer detection may be unreliable 1

Risk-Benefit Assessment

When considering dutasteride for BPH treatment:

  • Benefits: Improved urinary symptoms, reduced risk of acute urinary retention (77.3% relative reduction), and decreased need for BPH-related surgery 4

  • Risks: Potential increased detection of high-grade prostate cancer, sexual side effects (impotence, decreased libido, ejaculation disorders), and breast disorders 5

Conclusion for Clinical Practice

When prescribing dutasteride for BPH:

  1. Inform patients about both the reduced overall prostate cancer risk and the potential increased detection of high-grade cancers
  2. Do not use dutasteride specifically for prostate cancer prevention 5, 6
  3. Monitor PSA levels regularly, recognizing that any confirmed PSA increase while on dutasteride warrants evaluation for possible prostate cancer 5
  4. Consider that the FDA label explicitly states: "Dutasteride capsules are not approved for the prevention of prostate cancer" 5

The risk-benefit profile supports dutasteride use for symptomatic BPH with enlarged prostate, but requires vigilant PSA monitoring and appropriate patient counseling about cancer risks.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.