Treatment Options After Failure of Two TNF Alpha Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis
For patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have failed two subcutaneous TNF alpha inhibitors, switching to a biologic agent with a different mechanism of action such as abatacept, tocilizumab, or rituximab is strongly recommended over trying a third TNF inhibitor. 1
Evidence-Based Treatment Algorithm
First-Line Options After TNF Inhibitor Failures:
Non-TNF Biologics:
- Abatacept (T-cell co-stimulation modulator)
- Tocilizumab (IL-6 receptor inhibitor)
- Rituximab (B-cell depleting agent) - particularly in seropositive patients or those with certain comorbidities
JAK Inhibitors (tsDMARDs):
- Tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib (consider after biologics have failed) 1
Decision-Making Factors:
Type of TNF inhibitor failure:
Patient-specific considerations:
- Comorbidities (e.g., demyelinating disease favors IL-6 inhibitors or rituximab)
- Seropositivity status (rituximab may be particularly effective in RF/ACPA positive patients)
- Infection risk (consider abatacept if infection concerns)
- Route of administration preferences
Efficacy Evidence and Recommendations
The 2019 EULAR recommendations clearly state that after failure of a TNF inhibitor, treatment with another biologic DMARD or targeted synthetic DMARD should be considered 1. This is supported by high-quality evidence (level 1a, grade A recommendation).
The 2013 EULAR algorithm specifically recommends that after failure of the first biologic (typically a TNF inhibitor), any first biological drug should be replaced by abatacept, tocilizumab, rituximab, or another TNF inhibitor 1. However, after multiple TNF failures, the evidence increasingly favors switching to a different mechanism of action.
Rituximab is specifically indicated "for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to one or more TNF antagonist therapies" 2. Similarly, tocilizumab has demonstrated efficacy in patients with inadequate response to TNF antagonists 3.
Important Clinical Considerations
- Combination therapy: Non-TNF biologics and JAK inhibitors should generally be combined with methotrexate when possible for optimal efficacy 1
- Exception for monotherapy: IL-6 inhibitors (tocilizumab) may have advantages as monotherapy when methotrexate cannot be used 1
- Monitoring requirements: Assess response at 3 months; if no improvement, adjust therapy; target should be reached by 6 months 1
- Safety monitoring: Regular laboratory monitoring (CBC, liver function) is required for all biologics and JAK inhibitors
- Infection risk: Screen for latent TB and hepatitis B before initiating any biologic therapy 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Delaying treatment changes: Waiting too long to switch therapy after inadequate response leads to ongoing joint damage and disability
- Cycling through multiple TNF inhibitors: After two TNF failures, the likelihood of response to a third TNF inhibitor is significantly lower than switching to a different mechanism of action 4
- Inadequate methotrexate dosing: Ensure optimal dosing of background methotrexate (15-25 mg weekly) when using biologics
- Overlooking comorbidities: Certain biologics may be preferred or contraindicated based on specific comorbidities
- Ignoring patient preferences: Consider administration route and frequency when selecting therapy
By following this evidence-based approach and considering patient-specific factors, clinicians can optimize outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have failed multiple TNF inhibitors, improving long-term morbidity, mortality, and quality of life.