What is the significance of the Head Circumference (HC)/Abdominal Circumference (AC) ratio in estimating Fetal Weight (EFW) during obstetric ultrasound?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 21, 2025 • View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The Significance of HC/AC Ratio in Obstetric Ultrasound for Estimating Fetal Weight

The head circumference (HC) to abdominal circumference (AC) ratio is not an independent predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes and should not be relied upon for estimating fetal weight (EFW) in modern obstetric practice. 1

Understanding HC/AC Ratio in Fetal Growth Assessment

Historical Context and Evolution

The HC/AC ratio was traditionally used to classify fetal growth restriction (FGR) as either symmetric or asymmetric:

  • Historical perspective: In the past, the HC/AC ratio was thought to provide valuable information about the timing of pregnancy insult, etiology, and prognosis of FGR 1
  • Normal ratio changes: The ratio naturally decreases throughout pregnancy, starting at approximately 1.18 at 17 weeks and decreasing to about 0.96 at 40 weeks 2
  • Asymmetric vs. symmetric growth: An elevated HC/AC ratio (above the 95th percentile) was historically used to identify asymmetric growth restriction, suggesting "head-sparing" in cases of placental insufficiency 2

Current Evidence on HC/AC Ratio

Recent evidence has significantly changed our understanding of the HC/AC ratio's clinical utility:

  • Not predictive of outcomes: More recent studies have shown that growth and developmental delays are similar in both symmetric and asymmetric growth-restricted preterm newborns 1
  • Not an independent predictor: The HC/AC ratio is not an independent predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes 1
  • Limited clinical value: Current guidelines from the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) no longer recommend using HC/AC ratio for clinical decision-making in FGR management 1

Modern Approach to Estimating Fetal Weight

Superior Methods for EFW

Current evidence supports more comprehensive approaches to EFW:

  • Multiple biometric indices: Formulas based on 3 or 4 fetal biometric indices are significantly more accurate in estimating fetal weights than formulas based on 1 or 2 indices alone 1
  • Recommended parameters: Modern EFW calculations typically incorporate head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) 3
  • Best prediction formula: One validated formula is log(EFW) = 5.084820 - 54.06633 × (AC/100)³ - 95.80076 × (AC/100)³ × log(AC/100) + 3.136370 × (HC/100), where EFW is in grams and AC and HC are in centimeters 3

Clinical Implications for FGR Detection

For identifying and managing FGR, current evidence supports:

  • EFW percentile: EFW below the 3rd percentile is the strongest independent predictor of composite adverse perinatal outcomes 4
  • AC measurement: An AC below the 10th percentile has similar diagnostic accuracy to EFW below the 10th percentile for predicting small for gestational age (SGA) 1
  • Doppler studies: Abnormal umbilical artery Doppler indices predict adverse perinatal outcomes and should be incorporated into FGR assessment 1

Practical Application in Clinical Practice

When Evaluating Fetal Growth:

  1. Use comprehensive EFW formulas incorporating multiple biometric parameters (HC, AC, FL)
  2. Compare EFW to appropriate population-based reference charts
  3. Assess individual biometric parameters (particularly AC) rather than ratios
  4. Incorporate Doppler studies for suspected FGR cases
  5. Consider gestational age when interpreting results (early vs. late FGR have different clinical presentations)

Pitfalls to Avoid:

  • Don't rely solely on HC/AC ratio for diagnosing or classifying FGR
  • Avoid using single biometric measurements for EFW calculations
  • Don't focus exclusively on EFW without evaluating individual biometric parameters
  • Beware of technical factors that can affect measurement accuracy (image quality, equipment calibration, sonographer experience)

Conclusion

While the HC/AC ratio was historically used to classify FGR as symmetric or asymmetric, current evidence shows it has limited clinical value in modern obstetric practice. For accurate EFW and assessment of fetal growth, clinicians should use comprehensive formulas incorporating multiple biometric parameters and evaluate individual measurements rather than relying on the HC/AC ratio.

References

1
Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

3
Research

International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017

4
Research

Ultrasound prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at diagnosis of late-onset fetal growth restriction.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022

Related Questions

What is the average fetal weight gain per week?
Is a large head circumference concerning on fetal growth ultrasonography (ultrasound)?
What is the target blood pressure (BP) for a 35-year-old male with hyperlipidemia?
What is the best treatment for hot flashes and perceived headaches related to perimenopause in a 44-year-old female with a history of cervical cancer, chemotherapy-related blood clots (deep vein thrombosis), and active migraines without aura?
When to hold Eliquis (apixaban) in patients undergoing procedures?
Can abdominal circumference (AC) alone be relied upon to predict a large baby or shoulder dystocia?
Can hypertension cause a myocardial infarction (MI)?
What is the treatment plan for a patient with mildly reduced left ventricular systolic function, diastolic dysfunction, and mild to moderate valvular aortic stenosis?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Ask Question