Management of Hydronephrosis in Advanced Prostate Cancer
The best management for this patient's left hydronephrosis is retrograde ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) placement to relieve the obstruction. 1
Assessment of the Clinical Situation
This 78-year-old man presents with:
- Stage IV prostate adenocarcinoma treated with bilateral orchiectomy 3 years ago
- Marked left hydronephrosis on ultrasound with normal right kidney
- Currently asymptomatic
- Serum creatinine of 1.4 mg/dL (mild renal impairment)
- PSA level of 31 mg/mL (indicating disease progression)
Management Algorithm
Step 1: Determine the Urgency of Intervention
- Despite being asymptomatic, intervention is necessary because:
- Elevated creatinine indicates renal function impairment
- High PSA suggests active disease progression
- Unilateral hydronephrosis with normal contralateral kidney suggests ureteral obstruction from tumor
Step 2: Select the Appropriate Intervention
Two equivalent primary options exist 1:
Retrograde Ureteral Stenting:
- First-line therapy for management of ureteral obstruction caused by malignancy
- Performed via cystoscopy
- Less invasive than PCN
- May have lower technical success rate with extrinsic compression
Percutaneous Nephrostomy (PCN):
- Higher technical success rate in relieving obstruction compared to retrograde stenting, especially with extrinsic compression
- Provides immediate decompression
- Can be converted to internal-external nephroureteral stent if needed
Step 3: Follow-up and Additional Management
- Monitor renal function with serial creatinine measurements
- Consider systemic therapy for disease progression (PSA 31 mg/mL despite orchiectomy indicates castration-resistant disease)
- Periodic imaging to assess response and stent function
Evidence-Based Considerations
The ACR Appropriateness Criteria for Radiologic Management of Urinary Tract Obstruction specifically addresses malignant obstruction, noting that retrograde ureteral stenting or PCN are usually appropriate for patients with advanced malignancy and hydronephrosis 1.
For patients with advanced cervical carcinoma (which can be extrapolated to advanced prostate cancer with similar obstructive patterns), both retrograde ureteral stenting and PCN are considered equivalent first-line interventions 1.
Important Caveats
Technical success rates: PCN could have a higher technical success rate in relieving obstruction compared with retrograde double-J ureteral stenting, especially in cases due to extrinsic compression 1
Stent maintenance: Ureteral stents typically require exchange every 3-6 months to prevent encrustation and obstruction
Prognostic implications: Hydronephrosis in prostate cancer has been shown to have independent prognostic value for disease progression after hormonal treatment and correlates with shorter survival 2
Quality of life considerations: Internal stents generally provide better quality of life than external nephrostomy tubes, but may not be technically feasible in all cases
Complication risks: Both procedures carry risks of infection, bleeding, and technical failure. PCN has additional risks of pleural complications if a high approach is used 3
In this patient with asymptomatic hydronephrosis but elevated creatinine and PSA, prompt intervention is necessary to preserve renal function and prevent further complications, even though he is currently not experiencing symptoms directly related to the hydronephrosis.