What is the success rate of Invisalign (clear aligner orthodontic treatment) for treating orthodontic cases?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 23, 2025 • View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Invisalign Success Rate in Orthodontic Treatment

Invisalign clear aligners demonstrate a high success rate for mild to moderate malocclusions, with treatment effectiveness comparable to traditional fixed appliances, though they may be less effective for achieving "great improvement" in complex cases. 1

Treatment Effectiveness by Case Complexity

Mild to Moderate Cases

  • Invisalign shows comparable post-treatment outcomes to fixed appliances for mild to moderate malocclusions 1
  • Treatment duration is significantly shorter with Invisalign (approximately 5.7 months faster than fixed appliances) 1
  • All patients treated with Invisalign achieve at least a 30% reduction in Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) scores, indicating meaningful improvement 1

Complex Cases

  • The odds of achieving "great improvement" with Invisalign are 0.329 times lower compared to fixed appliances 1
  • More complex cases (PAR ≥22) show higher percentage improvements with multiple refinements compared to less complex cases 2
  • Success rates decline significantly after 3 refinements, with no additional improvement observed after 4 or more refinements 2

Success Factors and Predictability

Treatment Planning

  • The ClinCheck® software and proper biomechanical planning significantly impact treatment success 3
  • Virtual treatment modeling allows detailed evaluation of treatment options before beginning therapy 4
  • Since the introduction of SmartForce features and SmartTrack material, treatment efficacy has improved 3

Case Selection

  • Invisalign is most effective for non-extraction cases 4, 3
  • The system handles simple to moderate alignments better than extraction cases 4
  • Fully erupted dentition is required, making it more suitable for adults and adolescents with complete dentition 4

Refinements and Treatment Duration

  • Treatment duration increases with the number of refinements needed 2
  • Most patients achieve significant improvement after the first refinement (64.5% for less complex cases, 78.5% for more complex cases) 2
  • Additional refinements beyond 3 do not yield better occlusal outcomes 2

Interceptive Treatment in Mixed Dentition

  • Recent evidence suggests Invisalign First may be effective for interceptive treatment in mixed dentition 5
  • In a case series of 23 patients with 102 interceptive orthodontic malocclusion traits, 69% of treatment objectives were achieved with the first set of aligners 5
  • Additional aligners were required in the remaining cases to complete treatment 5

Advantages and Limitations

Advantages

  • Enhanced aesthetics compared to traditional braces 4
  • Improved patient comfort 4
  • Better oral hygiene due to removable nature 4
  • Shorter treatment duration compared to fixed appliances 1

Limitations

  • Less effective for achieving "great improvement" in complex malocclusions 1
  • Success heavily dependent on patient compliance 4
  • Limited control over specific tooth movements 4
  • May require additional documentation time 4

Clinical Considerations

  • Initial case complexity is directly associated with treatment duration, outcomes, and number of refinements needed 2
  • Patient selection is crucial for treatment success - ideal candidates have mild to moderate non-extraction alignment needs 4
  • The aligned force-driven system should be considered when developing digital treatment plans 3

While Invisalign has proven to be an effective alternative to traditional orthodontic treatment, particularly for mild to moderate cases, practitioners should carefully evaluate case complexity and set appropriate expectations with patients regarding potential limitations and the possible need for refinements.

References

1
Research

Evaluation of Invisalign treatment effectiveness and efficiency compared with conventional fixed appliances using the Peer Assessment Rating index.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 2017

2
Research

Association between initial complexity, frequency of refinements, treatment duration, and outcome in Invisalign orthodontic treatment.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 2022

4
Research

Advances in digital technology and orthodontics: a reference to the Invisalign method.

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2005

Related Questions

Can Invisalign (invisible orthodontic aligners) cause dizziness?
What are the considerations and treatment outcomes for a patient with mild to moderate malocclusion and good oral hygiene who is considering Invisalign (clear aligners)?
What are the potential risks and necessary adjustments for a 51-year-old post-menopausal woman, 6 years post-gastric bypass, taking vitamin D (10,000 IU), iron (Jamieson easy iron, 28 mg, 2 pills a day), and other supplements, with a history of hair loss, using a Mirena (levonorgestrel) IUD, and estrogen replacement therapy (estrodot, vaginal estrogen cream)?
What adjustments should be made to this patient's treatment plan to address her hair loss and manage her prediabetes status?
Is it wise to check testosterone levels to determine if I have hypogonadism (low testosterone) or hyperandrogenism (high testosterone)?
What is the initial treatment for olecranon bursitis?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Ask Question