What are the treatment options for liver cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Options for Liver Cancer

Treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) should be determined by a multidisciplinary team and based on tumor stage, liver function, and patient performance status, with the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system guiding treatment selection. 1

Staging and Assessment

Before initiating treatment, proper staging is essential:

  • Imaging studies: Triphasic CT scan or MRI of the abdomen is preferred 1
  • Liver function assessment: Child-Pugh classification and MELD score for transplant candidates 1
  • Performance status: ECOG performance status
  • Tumor characteristics: Size, number, vascular invasion, extrahepatic spread

Treatment Algorithm Based on BCLC Stage

Very Early Stage (BCLC 0) and Early Stage (BCLC A)

  • Single tumor ≤5 cm or up to 3 nodules ≤3 cm, no vascular invasion
  • First-line options:
    • Surgical resection: Best option for patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A), normal bilirubin, and no portal hypertension 1
    • Liver transplantation: Optimal for patients meeting Milan criteria (single tumor ≤5 cm or up to 3 tumors ≤3 cm) with cirrhosis 1
    • Ablative techniques: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) for patients with small tumors (≤3 cm) who are not surgical candidates 1

Intermediate Stage (BCLC B)

  • Multinodular tumors, no vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread
  • Standard treatment: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) 1

Advanced Stage (BCLC C)

  • Vascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, or cancer-related symptoms
  • Standard treatment: Systemic therapy
    • First-line: Sorafenib for Child-Pugh A patients 1
    • Second-line: Regorafenib for patients previously treated with sorafenib 2

Terminal Stage (BCLC D)

  • End-stage liver function or poor performance status
  • Recommended approach: Best supportive care 1

Specific Treatment Modalities

Surgical Options

  1. Liver resection:

    • 3-year survival rate of 54% in non-cirrhotic patients 1
    • Best for solitary tumors in non-cirrhotic liver or selected Child-Pugh A patients 1
    • Anatomical resections are preferred when possible 1
  2. Liver transplantation:

    • Best long-term outcomes with 5-year survival up to 80% 1
    • Indicated for patients meeting Milan criteria or expanded UCSF criteria 1
    • May consider patients within "up-to-seven criteria" (sum of size in cm and number of tumors equals 7) 1

Locoregional Therapies

  1. Ablative techniques:

    • RFA recommended for tumors ≤3 cm 1
    • PEI or microwave ablation (MWA) as alternatives 1
  2. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE):

    • Standard for intermediate-stage HCC 1
    • Not recommended for patients with decompensated cirrhosis, vascular invasion, or extrahepatic spread 1

Systemic Therapy

  1. Sorafenib:

    • First-line for advanced HCC with Child-Pugh A liver function 1
    • Monitor for adverse effects including hand-foot skin reaction and diarrhea
  2. Regorafenib:

    • FDA-approved for HCC patients previously treated with sorafenib 2
    • Monitor for hepatotoxicity with regular liver function tests 2

Important Considerations and Pitfalls

  • Multidisciplinary approach: Treatment decisions should involve hepatologists, surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, and interventional radiologists 1, 3

  • Liver function assessment: Treatment options are limited by underlying liver disease; Child-Pugh C patients generally only qualify for supportive care or transplantation within Milan criteria 1

  • Bridging therapies: For patients awaiting liver transplantation, locoregional therapies may be used to prevent tumor progression 3

  • Recurrence management: HCC has high recurrence rates even after curative treatments; surveillance and prompt management of recurrence are essential 1

  • Hepatotoxicity monitoring: Regular liver function monitoring is crucial, especially with systemic therapies like regorafenib which can cause severe hepatotoxicity 2

  • Avoid: Treating advanced HCC with systemic therapy in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C) as this can worsen outcomes and increase mortality 1, 2

By following this evidence-based approach to HCC management, clinicians can optimize outcomes and improve survival for patients with this challenging malignancy.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The importance of a multidisciplinary approach to hepatocellular carcinoma.

Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.