Don't benzodiazepines (Benzodiazepines) also pose abuse concerns, why are they approved for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) while pregabalin (Pregabalin) is not?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Benzodiazepines vs. Pregabalin for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Abuse Potential Comparison

Both benzodiazepines and pregabalin pose abuse concerns, but benzodiazepines are approved for GAD while pregabalin is not primarily due to differences in regulatory history, efficacy evidence, and risk-benefit assessment by regulatory authorities.

Abuse Potential Comparison

Benzodiazepines

  • Clearly recognized abuse potential with established regulatory controls
  • Guidelines explicitly state that "regular use can lead to tolerance, addiction, depression, and cognitive impairment" 1
  • Associated with paradoxical agitation in approximately 10% of patients 1
  • Withdrawal symptoms can include "rebound anxiety, hallucinations, seizures, delirium tremens, and, in rare cases, death" 1

Pregabalin

  • Classified as a Schedule V controlled substance (lower abuse potential than benzodiazepines) 2
  • FDA label notes "pregabalin is not known to be active at receptor sites associated with drugs of abuse" 2
  • Clinical studies showed 4% of pregabalin-treated patients reported euphoria compared to 1% with placebo 2
  • Recreational users rated pregabalin's "good drug effect," "high," and "liking" similar to diazepam 2

Key Differences in Regulatory Status

Why Benzodiazepines Are Approved for GAD

  1. Historical precedence: Benzodiazepines were approved decades ago when regulatory standards for abuse potential were different
  2. Established efficacy: Long history of demonstrated effectiveness for anxiety disorders
  3. Clinical utility: Rapid onset of action (within days) for acute anxiety symptoms
  4. Risk mitigation: Well-established prescribing guidelines with clear warnings about short-term use

Why Pregabalin Is Not Approved for GAD in the US

  1. Timing of regulatory review: Underwent FDA review when standards for abuse potential were more stringent
  2. Dependence concerns: Shows physical dependence with withdrawal symptoms including "insomnia, nausea, headache, diarrhea, anxiety and hyperhidrosis" 2
  3. Alternative treatments: Availability of other effective treatments for GAD with lower abuse potential (SSRIs, SNRIs)

Clinical Evidence for Pregabalin in GAD

Despite not being FDA-approved for GAD in the US, pregabalin has shown efficacy:

  • Comparable to lorazepam and alprazolam in controlled trials 3
  • Onset of anxiolytic activity within 1 week of treatment initiation 3
  • Effective for both psychic and somatic anxiety symptoms 4
  • Peak reduction in anxiety symptoms at approximately 450 mg/day 4
  • Demonstrated efficacy in elderly patients 5

Clinical Implications and Recommendations

When considering treatment for GAD:

  1. First-line options: Use SSRIs or SNRIs as first-line treatments due to better safety profiles
  2. Short-term benzodiazepine use: If benzodiazepines are necessary, use "infrequent, low doses of agents with a short half-life" 1
  3. Benzodiazepine alternatives: Consider buspirone (BuSpar) for mild to moderate agitation 1
  4. Monitoring requirements: For any patient on benzodiazepines or pregabalin, regularly assess for signs of misuse, tolerance, or dose escalation 2
  5. Special populations: Use additional caution in elderly patients due to increased sensitivity to adverse effects 1

Risk Mitigation Strategies

When prescribing medications with abuse potential:

  • Avoid concurrent use of benzodiazepines with opioids due to "near quadrupling of risk for overdose death" 1
  • Implement gradual tapering when discontinuing (25% dose reduction every 1-2 weeks) 1
  • Consider cognitive behavioral therapy as an adjunct to medication, especially when tapering 1
  • Regularly assess for signs of dependence or misuse

Both medication classes require careful consideration of risks versus benefits, but the regulatory distinction reflects historical timing of approval rather than a fundamental difference in safety profiles.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.