Prognosis of Scaling and Root Planing in Treating Periodontal Disease
Scaling and root planing (SRP) is highly effective in treating periodontal disease, with significant reductions in probing depth (0.81-0.99 mm) and gains in clinical attachment level (0.91-1.12 mm) that can be maintained for up to 5 years with proper maintenance care.
Effectiveness of SRP as Primary Treatment
Scaling and root planing demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes in the treatment of periodontal disease:
- SRP alone produces significant decreases in probing depths of 4-6 mm and >7 mm pockets 1
- Within 5 years of treatment, SRP results in:
- Significant reduction in gingival and plaque scores
- Fewer deep pockets (>7 mm) compared to other surgical procedures 1
- Maintenance of clinical attachment levels in moderate to deep pockets
Clinical Improvements with SRP
The clinical benefits of SRP include:
- Reduction in probing depth by 0.81-0.99 mm at sites with baseline probing depth ≥5 mm 2, 3
- Clinical attachment level gains of 0.91-1.12 mm 2, 3
- Significant decrease in bleeding on probing 2
- Improvement in gingival status in 84.61% of treated sites 4
Long-Term Prognosis
Long-term studies demonstrate sustained benefits:
- With good patient maintenance, excellent clinical results can be maintained for up to 5 years 1
- For pockets 4-6 mm deep, SRP provides sustained pocket reduction for up to 3 years 5
- For shallow pockets (1-3 mm), SRP maintains attachment levels without significant loss 5
- For deeper pockets (≥7 mm), initial reduction may be less than with surgical approaches, but differences diminish after 1-2 years 5
Adjunctive Therapies to Improve Outcomes
Several adjunctive therapies can enhance SRP outcomes:
Systemic subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline shows moderate benefits when added to SRP, with favorable benefit-to-risk ratio 6
Locally delivered antimicrobials (particularly tetracycline, minocycline, metronidazole, and chlorhexidine) provide modest additional improvements:
Probiotics as adjuncts to SRP show promising results:
Factors Affecting Prognosis
Several factors influence the prognosis of SRP:
- Patient compliance with maintenance care is critical for long-term success 1
- Initial pocket depth affects outcomes:
- Smoking status may negatively impact outcomes, with insufficient evidence supporting adjunctive antibiotic therapy in smokers 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
To optimize SRP outcomes:
- Inadequate maintenance care - Regular professional maintenance is essential for sustained results 1
- Overlooking predisposing factors - Treating underlying conditions like edema and venous insufficiency is crucial for preventing recurrence 7
- Insufficient instrumentation - Thorough removal of subgingival deposits is necessary for optimal outcomes 4
- Failure to consider adjunctive therapies for non-responding sites or complex cases 3, 6
Comparison to Other Treatment Approaches
When comparing SRP to surgical approaches:
- SRP is less invasive with minimal post-operative discomfort
- Modified Widman flap procedures may provide greater initial pocket reduction in deep pockets (≥7 mm) 5
- Osseous surgery results in more 1-3 mm sites (73.2%) at 5 years but may cause greater clinical attachment loss 1
- SRP shows fewer sites losing >2 mm of clinical attachment compared to osseous surgery 1
SRP remains the foundation of periodontal therapy, with excellent long-term outcomes when performed thoroughly and followed by appropriate maintenance care.