What is the prognosis for scaling and root planing in treating periodontal disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prognosis of Scaling and Root Planing in Treating Periodontal Disease

Scaling and root planing (SRP) is highly effective in treating periodontal disease, with significant reductions in probing depth (0.81-0.99 mm) and gains in clinical attachment level (0.91-1.12 mm) that can be maintained for up to 5 years with proper maintenance care.

Effectiveness of SRP as Primary Treatment

Scaling and root planing demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes in the treatment of periodontal disease:

  • SRP alone produces significant decreases in probing depths of 4-6 mm and >7 mm pockets 1
  • Within 5 years of treatment, SRP results in:
    • Significant reduction in gingival and plaque scores
    • Fewer deep pockets (>7 mm) compared to other surgical procedures 1
    • Maintenance of clinical attachment levels in moderate to deep pockets

Clinical Improvements with SRP

The clinical benefits of SRP include:

  • Reduction in probing depth by 0.81-0.99 mm at sites with baseline probing depth ≥5 mm 2, 3
  • Clinical attachment level gains of 0.91-1.12 mm 2, 3
  • Significant decrease in bleeding on probing 2
  • Improvement in gingival status in 84.61% of treated sites 4

Long-Term Prognosis

Long-term studies demonstrate sustained benefits:

  • With good patient maintenance, excellent clinical results can be maintained for up to 5 years 1
  • For pockets 4-6 mm deep, SRP provides sustained pocket reduction for up to 3 years 5
  • For shallow pockets (1-3 mm), SRP maintains attachment levels without significant loss 5
  • For deeper pockets (≥7 mm), initial reduction may be less than with surgical approaches, but differences diminish after 1-2 years 5

Adjunctive Therapies to Improve Outcomes

Several adjunctive therapies can enhance SRP outcomes:

  • Systemic subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline shows moderate benefits when added to SRP, with favorable benefit-to-risk ratio 6

  • Locally delivered antimicrobials (particularly tetracycline, minocycline, metronidazole, and chlorhexidine) provide modest additional improvements:

    • Additional probing depth reduction of 0.1-0.5 mm 3
    • These improvements are statistically significant but represent only a fraction of the improvement from SRP alone 3
  • Probiotics as adjuncts to SRP show promising results:

    • Statistically significant clinical attachment level gain (0.42 mm) 2
    • Significant reduction in bleeding on probing (14.66%) 2
    • Particularly effective in deep pockets with significant probing depth reduction (0.67 mm) 2

Factors Affecting Prognosis

Several factors influence the prognosis of SRP:

  • Patient compliance with maintenance care is critical for long-term success 1
  • Initial pocket depth affects outcomes:
    • Deeper pockets (≥7 mm) may show less improvement with SRP alone compared to surgical approaches initially 5
    • Moderate pockets (4-6 mm) respond well to SRP 1, 5
  • Smoking status may negatively impact outcomes, with insufficient evidence supporting adjunctive antibiotic therapy in smokers 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

To optimize SRP outcomes:

  • Inadequate maintenance care - Regular professional maintenance is essential for sustained results 1
  • Overlooking predisposing factors - Treating underlying conditions like edema and venous insufficiency is crucial for preventing recurrence 7
  • Insufficient instrumentation - Thorough removal of subgingival deposits is necessary for optimal outcomes 4
  • Failure to consider adjunctive therapies for non-responding sites or complex cases 3, 6

Comparison to Other Treatment Approaches

When comparing SRP to surgical approaches:

  • SRP is less invasive with minimal post-operative discomfort
  • Modified Widman flap procedures may provide greater initial pocket reduction in deep pockets (≥7 mm) 5
  • Osseous surgery results in more 1-3 mm sites (73.2%) at 5 years but may cause greater clinical attachment loss 1
  • SRP shows fewer sites losing >2 mm of clinical attachment compared to osseous surgery 1

SRP remains the foundation of periodontal therapy, with excellent long-term outcomes when performed thoroughly and followed by appropriate maintenance care.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.