Is urinary retention caused by water vapor thermal therapy treatable?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Urinary Retention Following Water Vapor Thermal Therapy

Urinary retention caused by water vapor thermal therapy is treatable with high success rates of 70-93% through appropriate management strategies. 1, 2, 3

Understanding Water Vapor Thermal Therapy and Retention

Water vapor thermal therapy (Rezūm) is a minimally invasive treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that uses convectively delivered thermal energy to ablate obstructive prostatic tissue. While effective for BPH symptoms, post-procedure urinary retention is a recognized complication that requires specific management.

Incidence and Mechanism

  • Urinary retention occurs due to temporary prostatic edema and tissue sloughing following the thermal ablation
  • Patients may require catheterization for a period following the procedure
  • In the CoreTherm study (similar thermal therapy), catheterization was required for 14 days compared to 3 days with TURP 4

Treatment Algorithm for Post-Procedure Retention

1. Initial Management

  • Planned catheterization period: Most patients require catheterization for approximately 28-31 days (median) following water vapor thermal therapy 1, 2, 3
  • First trial without catheter (TWOC): Should be attempted after the initial catheterization period

2. For Patients Who Fail Initial TWOC

  • Multiple TWOC attempts: Studies show an average of 1.6 TWOCs needed before successful voiding 1
  • Extended catheterization: May be required for up to 65 days in some cases 1
  • Alpha-blocker therapy: Consider adding or continuing during the catheterization period to relax prostatic smooth muscle

3. Success Rates and Timeline

  • Short-term success: 70.3% of catheter-dependent patients become catheter-free at a median of 26 days (range 4-65) 1
  • Medium-term success: 78.6% of patients void spontaneously after a median of 31 days 2
  • Long-term success: 93.5% remain catheter-independent at 3 months and 91% at 12 months 2, 3

Factors Affecting Recovery from Retention

Studies have found no significant predictors of successful treatment outcomes among:

  • Age
  • Prostate volume
  • Number of water vapor injections
  • Presence of median lobe
  • Duration of catheter dependency
  • ASA score 1, 2

Special Considerations

High-Risk Patients

  • Water vapor thermal therapy has shown effectiveness even in multimorbid patients (ASA III-IV) with catheter dependency who are considered unfit for surgery 2
  • Success rates remain high (78.6%) even in this challenging population 2

Medication Management

  • 69% of patients who become catheter-free can discontinue BPH medications 1
  • Consider continuing alpha-blockers during the recovery period to facilitate voiding

Potential Complications During Recovery

Adverse events are typically mild and transient:

  • Dysuria (13%)
  • Gross hematuria (4.4-10.5%)
  • Urinary tract infections (2.6-3.9%) 1, 2

Long-Term Outcomes

For patients who successfully overcome post-procedure retention:

  • Durable improvements in symptoms are maintained for up to 5 years
  • Surgical retreatment rates range from 4.4% to 7.5% at 5 years 5
  • Most patients maintain catheter independence once achieved (91-93.5% at 12 months) 2

Conclusion

Post-water vapor thermal therapy urinary retention is highly treatable with appropriate catheterization management and patience. The majority of patients (70-93%) will successfully void spontaneously within 1-2 months following treatment, with high rates of maintained catheter independence at long-term follow-up.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.