Development and Validation of a Wilderness First Aid Questionnaire for Malaysian Healthcare Workers
To develop and validate a questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitude, and confidence of healthcare workers in Malaysia on wilderness first aid, you should follow a systematic mixed-methods sequential exploratory design that includes expert interviews, focus groups, and quantitative assessment using psychometric validation techniques. 1
Conceptual Framework Development
Begin with a comprehensive literature review:
- Review existing wilderness first aid guidelines and assessment tools
- Identify key domains to be assessed (knowledge, attitude, confidence)
- Consider Malaysian cultural context and healthcare system specifics
Form an expert panel:
- Include wilderness medicine specialists
- Include Malaysian healthcare professionals
- Include psychometricians with expertise in questionnaire development
Content Development Phase
Knowledge Domain
- Develop items assessing knowledge of:
- Recognition and management of heat-related illnesses
- Management of traumatic injuries in remote settings
- Wound care and infection prevention in wilderness settings
- Evacuation decision-making criteria 1
- Local environmental hazards specific to Malaysian wilderness
Attitude Domain
- Develop items assessing:
- Perceptions about importance of wilderness first aid training
- Beliefs about personal responsibility in wilderness emergencies
- Views on wilderness first aid as part of professional development
Confidence Domain
- Develop items assessing self-efficacy in:
- Performing specific wilderness first aid skills
- Making decisions in remote settings with limited resources
- Adapting standard protocols to wilderness contexts
Validation Methodology
Phase 1: Content and Face Validity
- Submit draft questionnaire to expert panel review
- Conduct cognitive interviews with 8-10 healthcare workers
- Refine items based on feedback 2, 3
Phase 2: Pilot Testing
- Administer refined questionnaire to 30-50 healthcare workers
- Collect feedback on clarity, relevance, and comprehensiveness
Phase 3: Psychometric Validation
Administer to a larger sample (minimum 100-300 participants) 3
For Knowledge Domain:
For Attitude and Confidence Domains:
Assess reliability:
Important Considerations and Pitfalls
Cultural Adaptation
- Ensure questionnaire is culturally appropriate for Malaysian context
- Develop in both English and Bahasa Malaysia with proper translation validation
- Consider regional differences within Malaysia (peninsular vs. Borneo)
Practical Application
- Include scenario-based questions to better assess practical application of knowledge 1, 4
- Be aware that knowledge and self-efficacy scores may not correlate strongly with actual skill performance 4
- Consider including skills assessment component alongside questionnaire
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Overlooking the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical skills - research shows that written test scores don't accurately reflect competence in performing practical wilderness first aid skills 4
Neglecting regular reassessment - without additional training or refreshers, wilderness first aid knowledge and skills decrease significantly over time 4
Failing to address Malaysia-specific wilderness contexts - questionnaire should include items relevant to tropical forest environments 5
Not accounting for prior training experiences - 91% of workers in remote areas may have received standard first aid training but still lack wilderness-specific knowledge 5
Implementation Strategy
- Pilot the questionnaire with diverse healthcare worker populations across Malaysia
- Refine based on psychometric analysis
- Establish baseline data on current wilderness first aid preparedness
- Use findings to develop targeted training programs
- Plan for periodic reassessment to evaluate knowledge retention and training effectiveness
This structured approach will help develop a valid and reliable tool for assessing wilderness first aid knowledge, attitudes, and confidence among Malaysian healthcare workers, addressing a critical gap in emergency preparedness for remote settings.