What is the non-surgical treatment approach for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Non-Surgical Treatment Approach for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injuries

Non-surgical treatment with physical therapy and activity modification is the recommended first-line approach for ACL injuries in older patients with lower activity levels, as it allows patients to minimize functional instability while avoiding the risks associated with surgery. 1

Patient Selection for Non-Surgical Management

The decision between surgical and non-surgical management depends on several key factors:

Age and Activity Level Considerations

  • Younger patients (<30 years): Early ACL reconstruction is often recommended for those participating in high-level activities 1
  • Older patients (>40 years): Non-surgical management is typically more appropriate 1
  • Activity demands: Lower activity levels are better tolerated in ACL-deficient knees 1

Factors Favoring Non-Surgical Treatment

  • Older age
  • Female sex
  • Good knee function on initial assessment
  • Higher scores on knee function questionnaires (KOOS, KOS-ADLS) 2
  • Good performance on single-leg hop tests 2
  • No significant instability episodes after initial injury 3
  • No concomitant ligament or meniscal damage 3

Components of Non-Surgical Treatment

1. Initial Phase (Acute Management)

  • RICE protocol (Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation)
  • Pain management
  • Early range of motion exercises
  • Progressive weight-bearing as tolerated
  • Gait training

2. Rehabilitation Program

Three primary non-surgical approaches are considered appropriate by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 1:

  • Self-directed exercise program (rated 7/9 for appropriateness)
  • Supervised rehabilitation program (rated 7/9 for appropriateness)
  • Activity modification without reconstruction (rated 7/9 for appropriateness)

3. Comprehensive Rehabilitation Components

  • Lower extremity strength training: Focus on quadriceps, hamstrings, and core muscles 3
  • Cardiovascular endurance training 3
  • Neuromuscular training: Balance and proprioception exercises 3
  • Agility and sport-specific skill training 3
  • Balance perturbation training: To improve dynamic stability 3

Functional Bracing

ACL functional knee bracing without reconstruction is considered "May Be Appropriate" (rated 5-6/9) by the AAOS 1. While not definitively recommended for all patients, it may provide additional support during the rehabilitation process or return to activities.

Monitoring and Follow-Up

Regular assessment of:

  • Knee stability
  • Episodes of giving way
  • Return to desired activity level
  • Pain levels
  • Functional outcomes using validated tools (KOOS, IKDC)

Outcomes and Prognosis

  • Approximately 54% of highly active patients with ACL injury who choose non-surgical treatment have successful 2-year outcomes 2
  • The ACL SNNAP trial showed that surgical reconstruction was clinically superior to rehabilitation alone for non-acute ACL injuries with persistent symptoms of instability 4
  • 41% of patients initially managed non-surgically eventually required surgery within 18 months 4

When to Consider Delayed Surgical Intervention

Non-surgical treatment may fail, requiring delayed ACL reconstruction if:

  • Persistent instability develops despite rehabilitation 1
  • Patient experiences recurrent giving way episodes 1
  • Patient wishes to return to high-demand pivoting sports 5
  • Development of secondary meniscal or cartilage damage 1

Cautions and Pitfalls

  • Underestimating rehabilitation requirements: Successful non-surgical management requires dedicated adherence to rehabilitation protocols
  • Inappropriate patient selection: Patients with high activity demands may have poorer outcomes with non-surgical management
  • Delayed recognition of treatment failure: Persistent instability should prompt timely reconsideration of surgical options
  • Ignoring concomitant injuries: Meniscal tears or other ligament injuries may require different management approaches
  • Inadequate follow-up: Regular assessment is needed to identify those who may need to transition to surgical management

Non-surgical management should be considered a trial of conservative care, with the understanding that delayed surgical reconstruction remains an option if functional stability cannot be achieved through rehabilitation alone.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.