What is the fluid of choice for fluid administration in clinical scenarios?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Fluid of Choice in Clinical Scenarios

Balanced crystalloid solutions should be used as first-line fluid therapy in most clinical scenarios to reduce mortality and adverse renal events compared to 0.9% normal saline. 1

Types of Intravenous Fluids

Crystalloids

  1. Balanced crystalloids

    • Lactated Ringer's (RL)
    • Plasma-Lyte
    • Isofundine
    • Composition closer to plasma with lower chloride content
    • Better acid-base profile
  2. Unbalanced crystalloids

    • 0.9% Normal Saline (NS)
    • Higher chloride content (154 mmol/L)
    • Associated with hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis
  3. Hypertonic solutions

    • 3% or 7.5% saline
    • Not recommended as first-line treatment in hemorrhagic shock 1

Colloids

  • Albumin
  • Hydroxyethyl starch (HES)
  • Not recommended as first-line fluid therapy due to cost and lack of mortality benefit 1

Clinical Decision Algorithm for Fluid Selection

1. Critically Ill Patients

  • First choice: Balanced crystalloids (Lactated Ringer's or Plasma-Lyte)
  • Rationale: Reduced incidence of major adverse kidney events (MAKE 30: death, two-fold increase in serum creatinine, or renal replacement therapy) 1, 2
  • Caution: When using high volumes (>5000 mL), balanced solutions are particularly important to prevent hyperchloremic acidosis 1

2. Hemorrhagic Shock

  • First choice: Balanced crystalloids
  • Rationale: Potentially deleterious effects on renal function and survival with high-volume chloride-rich solutions 1
  • Avoid: 3% or 7.5% hypertonic solutions (Grade 1- recommendation) 1

3. Septic Shock

  • First choice: Crystalloids (preferably balanced) 1
  • Initial fluid challenge: Minimum 30 mL/kg of crystalloids 1
  • Avoid: Hydroxyethyl starches (Grade 1B recommendation) 1
  • Consider: Albumin when patients require substantial amounts of crystalloids 1

4. Acute Pancreatitis

  • First choice: Balanced crystalloids (particularly Lactated Ringer's)
  • Rate: For non-severe AP, non-aggressive fluid resuscitation (<10 mL/kg/hour) may be preferred 1
  • For aggressive resuscitation: >10 mL/kg/hour or >500 mL/hour for first 12-24 hours 1

5. Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Risk

  • First choice: Balanced crystalloids
  • Avoid: Excessive fluid administration for hypotension; consider earlier use of vasoactive medications 1
  • Caution: Avoid indiscriminate fluid administration based on "pre-renal" classification 1

6. Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)

  • First choice: Balanced crystalloids
  • Rationale: Lower incidence of iatrogenic hyperchloremia and better renal recovery compared to NS 3

Special Considerations

Albumin Use (Limited Indications)

  • Hypoproteinemia during major surgery
  • Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome with hypoproteinemia and fluid overload
  • Acute liver failure
  • Sequestration of protein-rich fluids (peritonitis, pancreatitis)
  • Not warranted in: Chronic nephrosis, chronic cirrhosis, protein losing enteropathies 4

Hyperkalemia Concerns

  • The potassium content in balanced solutions (4-5 mmol/L) generally does not increase risk even in patients with hyperkalemia 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Excessive fluid administration based on "pre-renal" classification of AKI 1

    • Instead, assess fluid responsiveness using dynamic parameters
  2. Routine use of normal saline in large volumes

    • Can cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis
    • May increase risk of AKI and mortality in critically ill patients 2
  3. Using hypertonic saline as first-line resuscitation fluid

    • No mortality benefit in hemorrhagic shock 1
  4. Using colloids as first-line fluid therapy

    • No clear benefit over crystalloids
    • Higher cost
    • Potential for adverse effects (renal failure with hydroxyethyl starch) 1
  5. One-size-fits-all approach to fluid rate

    • Fluid administration should be guided by hemodynamic assessment and clinical context 1

In conclusion, balanced crystalloid solutions should be the default choice for most clinical scenarios, with normal saline reserved for specific indications. The evidence increasingly supports that balanced solutions provide better outcomes in terms of acid-base balance, kidney function, and potentially mortality compared to normal saline, particularly when large volumes are required.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Balanced Crystalloid Solutions.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.