Wrist Blood Pressure Cuffs Are Not as Accurate as Brachial Cuffs
Wrist blood pressure monitors are not generally recommended for routine clinical use due to their lower accuracy compared to brachial (upper arm) monitors. 1 Most wrist monitors that have been tested have failed validation studies, making them less reliable for clinical decision-making.
Comparison of Brachial vs. Wrist Blood Pressure Monitors
Brachial (Upper Arm) Monitors
- Gold Standard: Monitors measuring BP in the brachial artery are considered the most reliable 1
- Evidence Base: Brachial artery pressure is the measure used in all epidemiological studies of high BP and its consequences 1
- Recommendation: Preferred for the majority of patients 1
- Validation: More likely to pass standard validation protocols 1
Wrist Monitors
- Accuracy Concerns: Most wrist monitors have failed validation studies 1
- Position Sensitivity: Require precise positioning at heart level, increasing the possibility of erroneous readings 1
- Clinical Evidence: In a study of cardiology outpatients, wrist measurements showed poor reliability with mean differences of 16±25/6±17 mmHg compared to conventional upper arm measurements 2
- Clinical Impact: In the same study, 43% of systolic and 46% of diastolic readings from wrist devices fell outside clinically acceptable limits 2
Key Factors Affecting Blood Pressure Measurement Accuracy
Proper Positioning
- The wrist must be held exactly at heart level when taking readings, which many patients fail to do consistently 1
- Incorrect positioning is the primary source of error with wrist monitors 1
- Some newer wrist models only take readings when the wrist is properly positioned over the heart, but experience with these is still limited 1
Cuff Size and Placement
- Proper cuff size is critical for accurate readings 1, 3
- Using a cuff that's too small can overestimate BP by 2-6 mmHg in men and 3-4 mmHg in women 3
- Using a cuff that's too large can underestimate BP by 3-5 mmHg in men and 1-3 mmHg in women 3
Special Considerations
When Wrist Monitors Might Be Considered
- In obese individuals where proper upper arm cuff placement is difficult 1
- When a patient has restrictions on brachial cuff placement (e.g., hemodialysis patients with vascular access) 1
Validation Requirements
- Regardless of type, patients should only use monitors that have been validated for accuracy according to standard international protocols 1
- Validated device lists are available on websites like Dabl Educational (http://www.dableducational.org) and the British Hypertension Society 1
Practical Recommendations
- Choose brachial (upper arm) monitors for most patients requiring home blood pressure monitoring 1
- Verify device validation before purchase or recommendation 1
- Check monitor accuracy by having patients bring their home device to clinic appointments to compare with office measurements 1
- Educate patients on proper measurement technique, including:
- Resting 5 minutes before measurement
- Proper positioning (sitting with back supported, feet flat on floor)
- Appropriate cuff placement
- Not talking during measurement 1
While wrist monitors are more convenient and increasingly popular (used by 22% of patients who own home monitors as of 2005) 1, their convenience does not outweigh the accuracy concerns for clinical decision-making. The American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association clearly state that wrist monitors are not recommended for routine clinical use 1.