Are birth control pills (oral contraceptives) classified as a carcinogen?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Birth Control Pills and Carcinogen Classification

Yes, combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are classified as Group 1 carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), though this classification must be understood in the context of their overall risk-benefit profile. 1, 2, 3, 4

Understanding the Carcinogen Classification

The IARC classification as a Group 1 carcinogen indicates that there is sufficient evidence that COCs can cause cancer in humans, specifically:

  • Increased risk of breast cancer: Current COC users have a relative risk of 1.24 (95% CI, 1.15-1.33) for breast cancer, with risk returning to baseline approximately 10 years after discontinuation 5
  • Increased risk of cervical cancer: Risk increases with duration of COC use, particularly with ≥5 years of use, and declines after discontinuation 5

However, this classification must be balanced against several important factors:

Cancer Risk Reduction Benefits

COCs also provide significant protective effects against certain cancers:

  • Reduced risk of endometrial cancer 5, 2
  • Reduced risk of ovarian cancer with protection lasting 15-20 years after discontinuation 5, 2
  • Reduced risk of colorectal cancer 5, 6

Risk Stratification and Context

The absolute risk increase for most cancers is small, particularly when considering:

  • Age-related factors: Breast cancer risk is highest in women <34 years when the baseline incidence is lowest 5
  • Duration of use: Some cancer risks correlate with longer duration of use 5
  • Time since discontinuation: Many risks diminish after stopping COCs 5

Progestin-Only Contraceptives (POCs)

POCs have a different risk profile:

  • Less data is available on cancer risks compared to COCs 7
  • Some evidence suggests POCs may also increase overall cancer risk, particularly for breast cancer 1
  • POCs do not appear to increase the risk of venous thromboembolism 8

Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm

When considering birth control options and cancer risk:

  1. Assess baseline cancer risk factors:

    • Family history of breast or reproductive cancers
    • Age (risks increase with age, particularly >35 years)
    • Smoking status (increases cardiovascular risks with COCs)
  2. Consider duration of planned use:

    • Short-term use has less impact on cancer risk
    • Long-term use (≥5 years) may increase certain cancer risks
  3. Evaluate alternative options:

    • For women with high baseline cancer risk, consider non-hormonal methods
    • For women with contraindications to estrogen, consider progestin-only methods

Important Caveats

  • The IARC classification does not produce risk-benefit analyses for specific populations 3, 4
  • The absolute risk increase for most women is small when compared to other risk factors
  • Pregnancy itself carries higher risks of certain conditions (e.g., VTE risk in pregnancy is 5-20 per 10,000 woman-years compared to 3-9 per 10,000 woman-years with COCs) 5
  • The WHO reports that COCs are not associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction in healthy, normotensive, nondiabetic, nonsmokers at any age 5

Conclusion

While birth control pills (specifically combined oral contraceptives) are classified as carcinogens, this classification must be interpreted within the context of their overall health impact, which includes cancer-protective effects and significant non-contraceptive benefits. The decision to use hormonal contraception should weigh these factors against individual risk factors and alternative options.

References

Research

The World Health Organization defines hormone replacement therapy as carcinogenic: is this plausible?

Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology, 2008

Research

IARC monographs program on carcinogenicity of combined hormonal contraceptives and menopausal therapy.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society, 2005

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Contraception and Uncommon Side Effects

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.