Non-Invasive Liver Fibrosis Assessment Tests
A comprehensive non-invasive liver screen should include both serum biomarkers and physical measurement of liver stiffness, with transient elastography (TE) being the preferred physical assessment method when available. 1
Types of Non-Invasive Tests
Non-invasive methods for assessing liver fibrosis fall into two main categories:
1. Biological Approach (Serum Biomarkers)
Basic Laboratory Tests
- AST (aspartate aminotransferase)
- ALT (alanine aminotransferase)
- Platelet count
- Total bilirubin
- Albumin
- Prothrombin time/INR
- GGT (gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase)
These parameters should be part of routine investigations in patients with suspected liver disease to enable calculation of simple non-invasive scores 1.
Serum-Based Fibrosis Scores
- FIB-4: Age (years) × AST [U/L]/(platelets [10⁹/L] × (ALT [U/L])½)
- Simpler to calculate and performs better than other simple NITs, particularly in NAFLD 1
- APRI (AST to Platelet Ratio Index): AST (/ULN)/platelet (10⁹/L) × 100
- AST/ALT ratio (AAR)
- Forns Index: 7.811 - 3.131 × ln(platelet count) + 0.781 × ln(GGT) + 3.467 × ln(age) - 0.014 × (cholesterol)
- NAFLD Fibrosis Score (for NAFLD patients)
Patented Serum Biomarkers
- FibroTest®: Combines α-2-macroglobulin, γGT, apolipoprotein A1, haptoglobin, total bilirubin, age and gender
- FibroMeter®: Combines platelet count, prothrombin index, AST, α-2-macroglobulin, hyaluronate, urea and age
- Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score® (ELF): Combines age, hyaluronate, MMP-3 and TIMP-1
- Hepascore®: Combines bilirubin, γGT, hyaluronate, α-2-macroglobulin, age and gender
2. Physical Approach (Elastography)
- Transient Elastography (TE/FibroScan®): Measures liver stiffness through mechanical waves
- Most widely validated non-invasive assessment for liver fibrosis 2
- High accuracy for detecting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis
- Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI)
- Shear Wave Elastography (SWE)
- Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE)
Recommended Testing Algorithm
First-line screening (particularly in primary care):
- Calculate simple non-invasive scores (FIB-4 recommended) using routine laboratory tests (AST, ALT, platelet count) 1
- These tests should be used to rule out rather than diagnose advanced fibrosis in low-prevalence populations
Second-line assessment (for indeterminate or high-risk results):
- Transient elastography (TE) when available
- Patented serum biomarkers when TE is not available
Combined approach:
- Combining TE with serum biomarkers increases diagnostic accuracy
- Concordance between tests increases reliability of the results
Disease-Specific Considerations
Hepatitis C
- All HCV patients should be screened to exclude cirrhosis by TE if available
- Serum biomarkers can be used in the absence of TE 1
- Patients diagnosed with cirrhosis based on non-invasive tests should undergo screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal hypertension
Hepatitis B
- TE generally has higher accuracy compared to serum biomarkers for advanced liver fibrosis 1
- LS <5-6 kPa often indicates absent or minimal liver fibrosis
- LS >12-14 kPa often indicates liver cirrhosis
- Caution needed when interpreting TE results in patients with elevated ALT levels
NAFLD/MAFLD
- FIB-4 performs well as an initial screening tool
- TE is particularly useful for detecting advanced fibrosis
Important Caveats and Pitfalls
ALT fluctuations: Elevated ALT can falsely increase liver stiffness measurements; interpretation should be cautious in patients with acute hepatitis or ALT flares 1
Spectrum effect: Non-invasive tests have lower sensitivity and higher specificity when applied in populations with lower disease prevalence 1
Indeterminate results: When non-invasive tests yield indeterminate results or show discordance, liver biopsy may still be necessary 1
Test limitations: Simple fibrosis scores include indirect markers of liver damage and are not direct markers of liver fibrosis; they should not be used as singular decision tools 1
Population selection: Non-invasive fibrosis tests should be preferentially used in patients at risk of advanced liver fibrosis (such as those with metabolic risk factors and/or harmful alcohol use) and not in unselected general populations 1
By implementing this structured approach to non-invasive liver fibrosis assessment, clinicians can effectively stratify patients according to their risk of significant liver disease while minimizing the need for invasive liver biopsies.