What is the accuracy of the Galleri (multi-cancer early detection) blood test?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Accuracy of the Galleri Cancer Detection Blood Test

The Galleri multi-cancer early detection (MCED) blood test shows promising preliminary results with high specificity, but its clinical utility for population-wide screening remains unproven as large-scale validation studies are still ongoing.

Current Evidence on Galleri Test Performance

The Galleri test is a blood-based screening tool designed to detect multiple types of cancer at early stages by analyzing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the bloodstream. Current evidence suggests:

  • The test aims to detect up to 50 different cancer types at potentially curable stages 1
  • Preliminary findings indicate high specificity (low false-positive rate) 2
  • The test is currently being evaluated in a large-scale NHS-Galleri trial in the UK, involving over 140,000 participants aged 50-77 years 3
  • The NHS trial is designed to determine whether the MCED test can reduce late-stage cancer incidence when used in asymptomatic screening 3

Limitations and Concerns

Several important limitations exist regarding the Galleri test:

  • Complete validation data on test sensitivity (ability to detect actual cancers) across all cancer types is still pending 1
  • Scientists have expressed concerns about the sensitivity and specificity claims 1, 4
  • The test has not yet completed the rigorous validation process that established screening tests have undergone 2
  • No randomized controlled trials with mortality outcomes have been completed 2

Context Within Cancer Screening Principles

When evaluating any cancer screening test, several key principles should be considered:

  • A screening test must be able to detect the majority of prevalent or incident cancers at the time of testing 5
  • The benefits of testing must outweigh the risks, including false positives that may lead to unnecessary procedures 5
  • The cost of testing should be reasonable compared to expected benefits 5
  • Testing must be practical and feasible for widespread implementation 5

Psychological Impact Considerations

The psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal from the Galleri test is being studied:

  • The sIG(n)al study is evaluating anxiety levels and psychological consequences in individuals who receive a positive result 6
  • This research recognizes that any screening method requires careful consideration of potential psychological harms 6

Current Status and Recommendations

The Galleri test represents an emerging approach to cancer screening but:

  • It is still considered investigational and not yet recommended for routine clinical use
  • The NHS-Galleri trial will help determine its clinical utility for population screening 3
  • Results from this trial will provide clearer understanding of the test's efficacy within healthcare systems 1

Comparison to Established Screening Methods

Unlike established screening methods such as colonoscopy or mammography:

  • The Galleri test has not yet demonstrated reduction in cancer mortality
  • Traditional screening tests have undergone decades of validation and refinement 5
  • Established screening methods have proven efficacy in reducing both cancer incidence and mortality for specific cancer types 5

While the Galleri test shows promise as a multi-cancer screening tool, patients and providers should understand that it remains in the validation phase and should not replace established, evidence-based cancer screening methods. The results of ongoing large-scale trials will be crucial in determining its ultimate role in cancer detection and prevention.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.