What are the survival rates for Luminal A, Luminal B, Triple Negative, and HER2 (Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2)-enriched breast cancer subtypes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Survival Rates for Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes

Luminal A breast cancer has the best survival rates among all subtypes, with approximately 92-97% 5-year survival, followed by Luminal B (88-91%), HER2-enriched (82-85%), and Triple Negative (77-83%) which has the poorest prognosis.

Molecular Subtypes and Their Characteristics

Breast cancer is now classified into distinct molecular subtypes based on hormone receptor status and HER2 expression:

  • Luminal A: ER/PR positive, HER2 negative, low proliferation/grade
  • Luminal B: ER/PR positive with either HER2 positive status or high proliferation (Ki67)
  • HER2-enriched: ER/PR negative, HER2 positive
  • Triple Negative: ER/PR negative, HER2 negative (often basal-like)

Survival Rates by Subtype

Luminal A

  • Best overall prognosis
  • 5-year overall survival: 92-97%
  • 5-year cancer-specific survival: 93-97%
  • Lowest recurrence rates (local recurrence 3.7%, distant metastasis 9.5%) 1, 2
  • More continuous pattern of recurrence over time, with potential for late recurrences

Luminal B

  • 5-year overall survival: 88-91%
  • 5-year cancer-specific survival: 89-93%
  • Higher recurrence rates than Luminal A
  • More continuous pattern of recurrence over time 2

HER2-enriched

  • 5-year overall survival: 82-85%
  • 5-year cancer-specific survival: 85%
  • Highest rates of local recurrence (7.5%) and distant metastases (25.6%) 2
  • Peak recurrence typically in the second year after diagnosis
  • Notably, in stage IV disease, HR+/HER2+ subtype shows better survival than HR+/HER2- (45.5% vs. 35.9%), likely due to advances in HER2-targeted therapies 3

Triple Negative

  • Poorest prognosis among all subtypes
  • 5-year overall survival: 77-83%
  • 5-year cancer-specific survival: 83-84%
  • Highest rate of regional recurrences (5.2%) 2
  • Peak recurrence typically in the second year after diagnosis
  • Higher risk of death compared to Luminal A (HR 2.17,95% CI: 1.44-3.27) 4

Factors Affecting Survival

Stage at Diagnosis

Stage significantly impacts survival across all subtypes:

  • Stage I: 96-97% 5-year survival
  • Stage II: 91-93% 5-year survival
  • Stage III: 74-76% 5-year survival
  • Stage IV: 40-43% 5-year survival 5

Racial/Ethnic Disparities

  • Triple-negative breast cancer is more common in women of African descent
  • African-American women have approximately three times higher risk of triple-negative disease compared to white women
  • Non-Hispanic Black women with late-stage TNBC have particularly poor outcomes, with 5-year relative survival of only 14% 1

Patterns of Metastasis

Different subtypes show distinct patterns of metastatic spread:

  • Luminal cancers: Primarily to bone
  • HER2-enriched: Primarily to liver and lung
  • Triple-negative/basal-like: Primarily to liver and brain 1

Clinical Implications

  1. Early Detection: Particularly crucial for aggressive subtypes (Triple Negative and HER2-enriched)

  2. Tailored Follow-up:

    • Luminal subtypes: Long-term follow-up needed due to continuous recurrence risk
    • Triple Negative and HER2-enriched: More intensive monitoring in first 2-3 years when recurrence risk peaks
  3. Treatment Planning:

    • Molecular subtyping should guide systemic therapy decisions
    • HER2-targeted therapies have significantly improved outcomes for HER2+ disease
    • Triple-negative disease requires aggressive chemotherapy approaches

Important Caveats

  1. Heterogeneity Within Subtypes: Survival can vary within each subtype based on additional factors like tumor grade, lymph node involvement, and specific genetic alterations

  2. Evolving Treatments: Survival rates continue to improve with advances in targeted therapies, particularly for HER2+ and emerging treatments for triple-negative disease

  3. Importance of Complete Receptor Testing: Missing receptor status can lead to overestimation of survival, as cases with missing data tend to have worse prognostic features 3

  4. Stage-Specific Differences: In advanced disease (stage IV), HER2+/HR+ tumors may have better outcomes than HER2-/HR+ tumors due to effective targeted therapies 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Differences in Breast Cancer Survival by Molecular Subtypes in the United States.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2018

Research

Survival time and molecular subtypes of breast cancer after radiotherapy in Thailand.

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.