Can Tezepelumab be used for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Tezepelumab for EGPA: Current Evidence and Recommendations

Tezepelumab is not currently recommended as a first-line or standard therapy for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), but it may be considered as an off-label option for patients with refractory EGPA-related asthma who have failed other approved therapies. 1, 2

Current Standard Therapies for EGPA

First-Line Treatments

  • Glucocorticoids: Remain the cornerstone of initial therapy for EGPA 3
  • Disease severity stratification:
    • Severe EGPA (FFS ≥1 or organ/life-threatening manifestations): High-dose glucocorticoids plus cyclophosphamide or rituximab 3
    • Non-severe EGPA: Glucocorticoids alone or with mepolizumab 3

FDA-Approved Biologics for EGPA

  • Mepolizumab: The only FDA-approved biologic for EGPA
    • Recommended dose: 300 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks 4
    • Particularly effective for non-severe disease and respiratory manifestations 3
    • Proven efficacy in the MIRRA randomized controlled trial 3

Evidence for Tezepelumab in EGPA

The evidence supporting tezepelumab use in EGPA is extremely limited:

  • Only case reports document its use in EGPA patients with refractory asthma 1, 2
  • Tezepelumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), targeting an upstream mechanism in the type 2 inflammatory pathway 1
  • Preliminary findings suggest potential benefit in patients with severe refractory EGPA-related asthma who have failed previous treatments, including mepolizumab 2

Important Considerations and Concerns

  • Persistent eosinophilia: Both reported cases showed persistent sputum eosinophilia despite clinical improvement, raising concerns about potential eosinophil rebound and related symptoms 1
  • Limited evidence: No clinical trials have evaluated tezepelumab specifically for EGPA
  • No guideline support: Current EGPA treatment guidelines do not mention tezepelumab 3, 4

Treatment Algorithm for EGPA

  1. Initial assessment: Determine disease severity using Five-Factor Score (FFS) 3

    • Obtain echocardiogram at diagnosis 3
  2. For severe EGPA (FFS ≥1 or organ/life-threatening manifestations):

    • High-dose glucocorticoids + cyclophosphamide or rituximab for induction 3
    • Maintenance: Rituximab, mepolizumab, or traditional DMARDs with glucocorticoids 3
  3. For non-severe EGPA:

    • Glucocorticoids alone or with mepolizumab for induction 3
    • Maintenance: Glucocorticoids alone or with mepolizumab 3
  4. For refractory disease:

    • Optimize inhaled/topical therapies for respiratory manifestations 3
    • For refractory asthma/ENT disease: Add mepolizumab (300 mg every 4 weeks) 3, 4
    • For patients failing mepolizumab: Consider rituximab (if systemic manifestations) 3
  5. For patients with refractory asthma who have failed mepolizumab:

    • Tezepelumab could be considered as an off-label, last-resort option 1, 2
    • Close monitoring for persistent eosinophilia and potential rebound effects is essential 1

Conclusion

While tezepelumab shows preliminary promise for refractory EGPA-related asthma in isolated case reports, it is not currently recommended in treatment guidelines. Mepolizumab remains the only FDA-approved biologic for EGPA, with substantial evidence supporting its efficacy. Patients with EGPA should first receive standard therapies based on disease severity before considering experimental options like tezepelumab.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.