According to the Strasburg classification, what type of bile duct injury appears normal on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Strasberg Classification Type A Bile Duct Injury Appears Normal on ERCP

According to the Strasberg classification, Type A bile duct injuries (leaks from the cystic duct stump or ducts of Luschka) appear normal on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) examination. 1

Understanding Strasberg Classification in Relation to ERCP Findings

The Strasberg classification is one of the most commonly used classification systems for bile duct injuries (BDIs) that occur during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. When evaluating bile duct injuries using ERCP, the appearance of the biliary tree varies based on the type of injury:

Type A Injuries

  • Characterized by bile leaks from the cystic duct stump or minor ducts in the liver bed (ducts of Luschka)
  • On ERCP, the main biliary tract appears anatomically normal
  • The injury is detected by contrast extravasation from the cystic duct stump or liver bed, not by abnormal appearance of the main bile ducts 1, 2

Other Strasberg Types and Their ERCP Appearance

  • Type B: Occlusion of part of the biliary tree (appears as non-filling of a segment of the biliary tree)
  • Type C: Transection without ligation of aberrant right hepatic duct (appears as contrast extravasation from the cut end)
  • Type D: Lateral injury to major bile ducts (appears as contrast extravasation from main bile duct)
  • Type E (1-5): Major injury to common hepatic or common bile ducts (appears as complete obstruction, stricture, or discontinuity of the main bile ducts) 1

Diagnostic Value of ERCP in Bile Duct Injuries

ERCP serves as both a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for bile duct injuries:

  • ERCP is particularly effective for diagnosing and treating Type A injuries (bile leaks) 2
  • For Type A injuries, ERCP with biliary stenting is often the definitive treatment 1, 2
  • ERCP is more useful in bile leak scenarios than in biliary obstruction scenarios 2
  • In suspected pancreatic duct and extrahepatic biliary tree injuries, ERCP can be used for both diagnosis and treatment even in the early phase after trauma 1

Clinical Implications

Understanding that Type A injuries appear normal on ERCP is important because:

  1. It helps differentiate minor injuries (Type A) from major injuries (Types B-E)
  2. It guides appropriate management decisions:
    • Type A injuries can typically be managed endoscopically with ERCP and stenting
    • More complex injuries (Types B-E) often require surgical intervention 1, 2

Management Considerations

For Type A injuries that appear normal on ERCP:

  • If a drain is placed after surgery and a bile leak is noted, an observation period and non-operative management during the first hours is an option 1
  • If no improvements occur during observation, endoscopic management with ERCP, biliary sphincterotomy, and stent placement becomes mandatory 1
  • ERCP with stenting is highly effective for Type A injuries, with success rates approaching 90% 1, 2

Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Do not mistake a normal-appearing biliary tree on ERCP as absence of injury when clinical suspicion for bile leak exists
  2. Remember that Type A injuries may not be immediately apparent and can present days after surgery
  3. Do not rely solely on ERCP for diagnosis of major bile duct injuries (Types B-E), as additional imaging modalities like MRCP or PTC may be necessary for complete evaluation 1, 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.